Ecoer Logo
VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS0.00%
Net Worth
1.140USD
STEEM
0.000STEEM
SBD
0.000SBD
Own SP
19.662SP

Detailed Balance

STEEM
balance
0.000STEEM
market_balance
0.000STEEM
savings_balance
0.000STEEM
reward_steem_balance
0.000STEEM
STEEM POWER
Own SP
19.662SP
Delegated Out
0.000SP
Delegation In
0.000SP
Effective Power
19.662SP
Reward SP (pending)
0.000SP
SBD
sbd_balance
0.000SBD
sbd_conversions
0.000SBD
sbd_market_balance
0.000SBD
savings_sbd_balance
0.000SBD
reward_sbd_balance
0.000SBD
{
  "balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "31978.260274 VESTS",
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "received_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "conversions": []
}

Account Info

namebsdetector
id82876
rank75,528
reputation13567406
created2016-09-04T09:59:27
recovery_accountsteem
proxyNone
post_count3
comment_count0
lifetime_vote_count0
witnesses_voted_for0
last_post2016-11-05T22:03:18
last_root_post1970-01-01T00:00:00
last_vote_time1970-01-01T00:00:00
proxied_vsf_votes0, 0, 0, 0
can_vote1
voting_power10,000
delayed_votes0
balance0.000 STEEM
savings_balance0.000 STEEM
sbd_balance0.000 SBD
savings_sbd_balance0.000 SBD
vesting_shares31978.260274 VESTS
delegated_vesting_shares0.000000 VESTS
received_vesting_shares0.000000 VESTS
reward_vesting_balance0.000000 VESTS
vesting_balance0.000 STEEM
vesting_withdraw_rate0.000000 VESTS
next_vesting_withdrawal1969-12-31T23:59:59
withdrawn0
to_withdraw0
withdraw_routes0
savings_withdraw_requests0
last_account_recovery1970-01-01T00:00:00
reset_accountnull
last_owner_update1970-01-01T00:00:00
last_account_update1970-01-01T00:00:00
minedNo
sbd_seconds0
sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
savings_sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
{
  "active": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6UU67JrUruhoXCMuia1YZegjoVjk55a3dE35UkUxjMkgCmicSG",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "can_vote": true,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "created": "2016-09-04T09:59:27",
  "curation_rewards": 0,
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "downvote_manabar": {
    "current_mana": 0,
    "last_update_time": 1472983167
  },
  "guest_bloggers": [],
  "id": 82876,
  "json_metadata": "",
  "last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_account_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_post": "2016-11-05T22:03:18",
  "last_root_post": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_vote_time": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "lifetime_vote_count": 0,
  "market_history": [],
  "memo_key": "STM5sxbqcVm33qsSdWaQhcLRg6uyuRwqdEQBL8D3kcXsBYAscu4rA",
  "mined": false,
  "name": "bsdetector",
  "next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
  "other_history": [],
  "owner": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM5wAsDcG5QDtX4HiMZBNM3eQvNxXKojVNMjhNCTrN1AQRC1dqbH",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
  "post_bandwidth": 0,
  "post_count": 3,
  "post_history": [],
  "posting": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM7cQefZGnHXF73FVTYqhAjzjxKJ3FhieBw24wjaotQFxKEFB1ho",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "posting_json_metadata": "",
  "posting_rewards": 0,
  "proxied_vsf_votes": [
    0,
    0,
    0,
    0
  ],
  "proxy": "",
  "received_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "recovery_account": "steem",
  "reputation": 13567406,
  "reset_account": "null",
  "reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_vesting_balance": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "reward_vesting_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
  "savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
  "sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "sbd_seconds": "0",
  "sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "tags_usage": [],
  "to_withdraw": 0,
  "transfer_history": [],
  "vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "31978.260274 VESTS",
  "vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "vote_history": [],
  "voting_manabar": {
    "current_mana": 10000,
    "last_update_time": 1472983167
  },
  "voting_power": 10000,
  "withdraw_routes": 0,
  "withdrawn": 0,
  "witness_votes": [],
  "witnesses_voted_for": 0,
  "rank": 75528
}

Withdraw Routes

IncomingOutgoing
Empty
Empty
{
  "incoming": [],
  "outgoing": []
}
From Date
To Date
2016/11/05 22:03:18
authorbsdetector
bodyStef made the argument before that if you are in a concentration camp and your captor gives you a plate of food you are not "accepting" your imprisonment by eating the food, you are merely trying not to die and wait for better circumstances. We are that prisoner bro. And Trump is the guard that doesn't agree with what is happening and manages to get extra food for the prisoners and gives info to the prisoners that the war is about to end and to keep holding a bit longer. The thing is we have to be pragmatic here. Are we going to see a libertarian society in our life time? No. People are still way too dumb for that. So change must come a little at a time. If we get to vote on whether taxes are 50% or 25%, I say vote for 25%. Is that legitimizing theft? No, that is choosing the best of 2 evils. It's just that there isn't an option for "No taxes". And I think the option isn't going from "choose your next master" to "should there be taxes". It'll be more gradual than that.
json metadata{"tags":["anarchism"]}
parent authordsayers
parent permlinkthe-fight-for-western-civilization-debunked
permlinkre-dsayers-the-fight-for-western-civilization-debunked-20161105t220322024z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #6469059/Trx 88a6279fc85eb8ec4f744779c9a34a991c012ee5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 6469059,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "bsdetector",
      "body": "Stef made the argument before that if you are in a concentration camp and your captor gives you a plate of food you are not \"accepting\" your imprisonment by eating the food, you are merely trying not to die and wait for better circumstances. We are that prisoner bro. And Trump is the guard that doesn't agree with what is happening and manages to get extra food for the prisoners and gives info to the prisoners that the war is about to end and to keep holding a bit longer. \n\nThe thing is we have to be pragmatic here. Are we going to see a libertarian society in our life time? No. People are still way too dumb for that. So change must come a little at a time. If we get to vote on whether taxes are 50% or 25%, I say vote for 25%. Is that legitimizing theft? No, that is choosing the best of 2 evils. It's just that there isn't an option for \"No taxes\". And I think the option isn't going from \"choose your next master\" to \"should there be taxes\". It'll be more gradual than that.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"anarchism\"]}",
      "parent_author": "dsayers",
      "parent_permlink": "the-fight-for-western-civilization-debunked",
      "permlink": "re-dsayers-the-fight-for-western-civilization-debunked-20161105t220322024z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-11-05T22:03:18",
  "trx_id": "88a6279fc85eb8ec4f744779c9a34a991c012ee5",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2016/09/04 15:32:39
authorbsdetector
permlinkre-culain-re-telos-re-intothewild-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t111249050z
votertelos
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #4679381/Trx 86bfec1c675eeae39fc4f1142266045c269d9d7a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 4679381,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "bsdetector",
      "permlink": "re-culain-re-telos-re-intothewild-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t111249050z",
      "voter": "telos",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-04T15:32:39",
  "trx_id": "86bfec1c675eeae39fc4f1142266045c269d9d7a",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2016/09/04 11:12:48
authorbsdetector
bodyreplying to telos 1) people have their judgement clouded when using alcohol. They confuse distances, their reaction time is impaired, they may have halluciations, etc. 2) people are irrational to the point where they may not be conscious of their own impairment 3) If people are unconscious of the wrongs they may cause by driving, you have the right to stop the imminent disaster, because you will use violence to stop potential harm Take this analogy Someone puts a mentally retarded person in a room with 100 switches and 1 of those switches sends a nuclear bomb to a random country. This mentally retarded person doesn't know this and he doesn't know what the switches are for. Do you not use force to get the person away from the room, if you know indeed that one of those switches poses a threat? New dilemma: there is a person guarding the room and that person has be instructed to stop any intruders. You have to use force upon that person if he does not move. You have to use force if there are 2,3,4,5 security guys. Of course this is the trolley problem. You did not put the mentally retarded person in the room with the switches. But to be moral you have to act morally despite the circunstances. So if that means breaking the NAP to prevent violence then yes, you should. Now all this being said, you have to make the case that robbing everyone in the country to pay for the police when the police themselves do immoral actions without justification (like jailing people for non violent crimes) is itself moral. Which it isn't. So if you are going to go through the consequentialism route instead of the moral objetivity route then be prepared to justify every possible consequence of an action, not just 5 lives are better than 1 (even this can be discussed as you could be killing Einstein instead of Hitler, Mussolini, etc). So what is justified self defence? Like you said, you really don't need the bullet to be lodged in your brain for you to be able to act with violence in self defence. I guess fines are a good way to keep people from driving drunk, but otherwise I'm stumped.
json metadata{"tags":["statism"]}
parent authorculain
parent permlinkre-telos-re-intothewild-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t032937816z
permlinkre-culain-re-telos-re-intothewild-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t111249050z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #4674195/Trx d0cf4780f0a6ebb52d053554646bc85143b4dd85
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 4674195,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "bsdetector",
      "body": "replying to telos\n1) people have their judgement clouded when using alcohol. They confuse distances, their reaction time is impaired, they may have halluciations, etc. \n2) people are irrational to the point where they may not be conscious of their own impairment\n3) If people are unconscious of the wrongs they may cause by driving, you have the right to stop the imminent disaster, because you will use violence to stop potential harm\n\nTake this analogy\nSomeone puts a mentally retarded person in a room with 100 switches and 1 of those switches sends a nuclear bomb to a random country. This mentally retarded person doesn't know this and he doesn't know what the switches are for.\nDo you not use force to get the person away from the room, if you know indeed that one of those switches poses a threat?\n\nNew dilemma: there is a person guarding the room and that person has be instructed to stop any intruders. You have to use force upon that person if he does not move.  You have to use force if there are 2,3,4,5 security guys.\n\nOf course this is the trolley problem. You did not put the mentally retarded person in the room with the switches. But to be moral you have to act morally despite the circunstances. So if that means breaking the NAP to prevent violence then yes, you should. \n\nNow all this being said, you have to make the case that robbing everyone in the country to pay for the police when the police themselves do immoral actions without justification (like jailing people for non violent crimes) is itself moral. Which it isn't.\nSo if you are going to go through the consequentialism route instead of the moral objetivity route then be prepared to justify every possible consequence of an action, not just 5 lives are better than 1 (even this can be discussed as you could be killing Einstein instead of Hitler, Mussolini, etc).\n\nSo what is justified self defence? Like you said, you really don't need the bullet to be  lodged in your brain for you to be able to act with violence in self defence. I guess fines are a good way to keep people from driving drunk, but otherwise I'm stumped.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"statism\"]}",
      "parent_author": "culain",
      "parent_permlink": "re-telos-re-intothewild-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t032937816z",
      "permlink": "re-culain-re-telos-re-intothewild-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t111249050z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-04T11:12:48",
  "trx_id": "d0cf4780f0a6ebb52d053554646bc85143b4dd85",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2016/09/04 10:24:42
authorbsdetector
bodyanswering telos The morals are decided by what is logically consistent. If you decide murder is moral then you are saying that another person can exert his will upon (kill you) you but you can't exert your will upon him (not be killed) (assuming you want to live, if you don't, then it isn't murder, it's assisted suicide). So it's logically inconsistent, like saying 2=3, which we all know to be false simply my empirical facts. The case for property rights is this: you own yourself (if you need logical proof on this go search it, I just assumed it as true). When you are born you aren't born into slavery. No one can take your arm, eat it, and you'll be ok with it. So by owning yourself you can do whatever you want to do with your time, as long as it isn't causing harm to anyone (you aren't murdering anyone, raping anyone, etc). So if you decide to spend 8 hours to get money and then you buy property with that money, no one should be able to steal any part of that property or the money you worked for, unless you consent to that (social contract doesn't involve consent). A culture without personal property would be sustainable only insofar as it would be moral, ie the people would have to CONSENT to give their property away. So if I work for 8h and you work for 4h I would have to freely give my 2h of work to you (in the form of currency or food or whatever). But this, as you know, has too many ways to go wrong... that's why communism doesn't work. So there, I just proved morality is objective despite cultural beliefs (which aren't logical - if you are going to use tribes to base your arguments remember that we used to burn witches, commit infanticide, etc. the only logical argument that can be sustained is that an immoral action (murder) can become moral once you have consent (murder -> euthanasia, rape -> sex, theft -> giving stuff, violence -> martial arts, etc...)
json metadata{"tags":["statism"]}
parent authordsayers
parent permlinkre-telos-re-larkenrose-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160903t164510978z
permlinkre-dsayers-re-telos-re-larkenrose-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t102444345z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #4673269/Trx aab8af39b1382edd612b88e7c000fdc100b828ef
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 4673269,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "bsdetector",
      "body": "answering telos\nThe morals are decided by what is logically consistent. If you decide murder is moral then you are saying that another person can exert his will upon (kill you) you but you can't exert your will upon him (not be killed) (assuming you want to live, if you don't, then it isn't murder, it's assisted suicide). So it's logically inconsistent, like saying 2=3, which we all know to be false simply my empirical facts. \nThe case for property rights is this: you own yourself (if you need logical proof on this go search it, I just assumed it as true). When you are born you aren't born into slavery. No one can take your arm, eat it, and you'll be ok with it. So by owning yourself you can do whatever you want to do with your time, as long as it isn't causing harm to anyone (you aren't murdering anyone, raping anyone, etc). So if you decide to spend 8 hours to get money and then you buy property with that money, no one should be able to steal any part of that property or the money you worked for, unless you consent to that (social contract doesn't involve consent).\nA culture without personal property would be sustainable only insofar as it would be moral, ie the people would have to CONSENT to give their property away. So if I work for 8h and you work for 4h I would have to freely give my 2h of work to you (in the form of currency or food or whatever). But this, as you know, has too many ways to go wrong... that's why communism doesn't work. \n\nSo there, I just proved morality is objective despite cultural beliefs (which aren't logical - if you are going to use tribes to base your arguments remember that we used to burn witches, commit infanticide, etc. the only logical argument that can be sustained is that an immoral action (murder) can become moral once you have consent (murder -> euthanasia, rape -> sex, theft -> giving stuff, violence -> martial arts, etc...)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"statism\"]}",
      "parent_author": "dsayers",
      "parent_permlink": "re-telos-re-larkenrose-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160903t164510978z",
      "permlink": "re-dsayers-re-telos-re-larkenrose-re-telos-re-larkenrose-principles-and-predictions-20160904t102444345z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-04T10:24:42",
  "trx_id": "aab8af39b1382edd612b88e7c000fdc100b828ef",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemcreated a new account: @bsdetector
2016/09/04 09:59:27
active{"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM6UU67JrUruhoXCMuia1YZegjoVjk55a3dE35UkUxjMkgCmicSG",1]],"weight_threshold":1}
creatorsteem
fee10.000 STEEM
json metadata
memo keySTM5sxbqcVm33qsSdWaQhcLRg6uyuRwqdEQBL8D3kcXsBYAscu4rA
new account namebsdetector
owner{"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM5wAsDcG5QDtX4HiMZBNM3eQvNxXKojVNMjhNCTrN1AQRC1dqbH",1]],"weight_threshold":1}
posting{"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM7cQefZGnHXF73FVTYqhAjzjxKJ3FhieBw24wjaotQFxKEFB1ho",1]],"weight_threshold":1}
Transaction InfoBlock #4672790/Trx f86f0fd6942811071937947df0c77d9aa94e1635
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 4672790,
  "op": [
    "account_create",
    {
      "active": {
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM6UU67JrUruhoXCMuia1YZegjoVjk55a3dE35UkUxjMkgCmicSG",
            1
          ]
        ],
        "weight_threshold": 1
      },
      "creator": "steem",
      "fee": "10.000 STEEM",
      "json_metadata": "",
      "memo_key": "STM5sxbqcVm33qsSdWaQhcLRg6uyuRwqdEQBL8D3kcXsBYAscu4rA",
      "new_account_name": "bsdetector",
      "owner": {
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM5wAsDcG5QDtX4HiMZBNM3eQvNxXKojVNMjhNCTrN1AQRC1dqbH",
            1
          ]
        ],
        "weight_threshold": 1
      },
      "posting": {
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM7cQefZGnHXF73FVTYqhAjzjxKJ3FhieBw24wjaotQFxKEFB1ho",
            1
          ]
        ],
        "weight_threshold": 1
      }
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-04T09:59:27",
  "trx_id": "f86f0fd6942811071937947df0c77d9aa94e1635",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

Account Metadata

POSTING JSON METADATA
None
JSON METADATA
None
{
  "posting_json_metadata": {},
  "json_metadata": {}
}

Auth Keys

Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM5wAsDcG5QDtX4HiMZBNM3eQvNxXKojVNMjhNCTrN1AQRC1dqbH1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6UU67JrUruhoXCMuia1YZegjoVjk55a3dE35UkUxjMkgCmicSG1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM7cQefZGnHXF73FVTYqhAjzjxKJ3FhieBw24wjaotQFxKEFB1ho1/1
Memo
STM5sxbqcVm33qsSdWaQhcLRg6uyuRwqdEQBL8D3kcXsBYAscu4rA
{
  "owner": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM5wAsDcG5QDtX4HiMZBNM3eQvNxXKojVNMjhNCTrN1AQRC1dqbH",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "active": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6UU67JrUruhoXCMuia1YZegjoVjk55a3dE35UkUxjMkgCmicSG",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "posting": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM7cQefZGnHXF73FVTYqhAjzjxKJ3FhieBw24wjaotQFxKEFB1ho",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "memo": "STM5sxbqcVm33qsSdWaQhcLRg6uyuRwqdEQBL8D3kcXsBYAscu4rA"
}

Witness Votes

0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]