{
  "block": 43198226,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "nishantd",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "1953.311140 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-05-08T13:41:15",
  "trx_id": "e5a57b36c34c425c7a17b55c35fc09fdc0944516",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 37569319,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @nishantd! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@nishantd/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@nishantd) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=nishantd)_</sub>\n\n\n**Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:**\n<table><tr><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemfest/@steemitboard/steemfest-commemorative-badge-refactored\"><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/64x128/https://files.steempeak.com/file/steempeak/arcange/YqQV5Tbj-image.png\"></a></td><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemfest/@steemitboard/steemfest-commemorative-badge-refactored\">SteemFest⁴  commemorative badge refactored</a></td></tr></table>\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-nishantd-20191024t170520000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-10-24T17:05:21",
  "trx_id": "fc00acbb1402ae170195b8de511da095d5b8a160",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 34114461,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "nishantd",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "9949.031797 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-25T17:36:51",
  "trx_id": "08d76db8caaa04629e75d484da1ff7a89a35207b",
  "trx_in_block": 24,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 27098188,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @nishantd! You have received a personal award!\n\n[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@nishantd/birthday1.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@nishantd)  1 Year on Steemit\n<sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub>\n\n\n**Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:**\n<table><tr><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-ranking-update-resteem-and-resteemed-added\"><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/64x128/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmfRVpHQhLDhnjDtqck8GPv9NPvNKPfMsDaAFDE1D9Er2Z/header_ranking.png\"></a></td><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-ranking-update-resteem-and-resteemed-added\">SteemitBoard Ranking update - Resteem and Resteemed added</a></td></tr></table>\n\n> Support [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)! **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-nishantd-20181024t205034000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-10-24T20:50:33",
  "trx_id": "7a3d7e56ebd863cb0795a5912f1dda86396e605a",
  "trx_in_block": 23,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 23902321,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "nishantd",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "10148.034443 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-07-05T06:38:39",
  "trx_id": "c1341afcbbdaa03ab2412ecb3a6f0f50e7922598",
  "trx_in_block": 27,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 21347764,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.000 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "0.000007 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-04-07T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 34
}

{
  "block": 21292451,
  "op": [
    "transfer",
    {
      "amount": "7.124 STEEM",
      "from": "nishantd",
      "memo": "9dc02a12-1522-409c-bc38-9a9315d27c8c",
      "to": "blocktrades"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-04-05T05:44:48",
  "trx_id": "69cee0862b306e33b1e5c82742659eee424b0c04",
  "trx_in_block": 28,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 21146200,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.549 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-31T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 3
}

{
  "block": 20944666,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.549 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-24T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 77
}

{
  "block": 20743916,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.549 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-17T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 9
}

{
  "block": 20542605,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.549 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-10T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 14
}

{
  "block": 20341203,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.548 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-03T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 14
}

{
  "block": 20139836,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.548 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-02-24T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 15
}

{
  "block": 19938287,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.548 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-02-17T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 36
}

{
  "block": 19736866,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.548 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-02-10T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 23
}

{
  "block": 19535694,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.548 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-02-03T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 7
}

{
  "block": 19334299,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.547 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-01-27T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 9
}

{
  "block": 19132794,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.547 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-01-20T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 10
}

{
  "block": 18931324,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.547 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-01-13T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 10
}

{
  "block": 18729929,
  "op": [
    "fill_vesting_withdraw",
    {
      "deposited": "0.547 STEEM",
      "from_account": "nishantd",
      "to_account": "nishantd",
      "withdrawn": "1121.477913 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-01-06T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 7
}

{
  "block": 18528607,
  "op": [
    "withdraw_vesting",
    {
      "account": "nishantd",
      "vesting_shares": "14579.212876 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-12-30T03:50:48",
  "trx_id": "eecc07b696d7d9121ac4fd3de8c8135bce967864",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 18032649,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "nishantd",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "16186.787124 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-12-12T22:23:18",
  "trx_id": "96d63708923c4d7d0c1603ced15ff1f544e678f0",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17401204,
  "op": [
    "claim_reward_balance",
    {
      "account": "nishantd",
      "reward_sbd": "0.030 SBD",
      "reward_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
      "reward_vests": "139.690323 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-20T23:55:54",
  "trx_id": "3fb9b3dac5378fbf65255b3a61140b30b6c556f2",
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17275186,
  "op": [
    "curation_reward",
    {
      "comment_author": "wendygoh",
      "comment_permlink": "malaysia-french-town-bukit-tinggi",
      "curator": "nishantd",
      "reward": "8.215527 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-16T14:52:51",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 13
}

{
  "block": 17274935,
  "op": [
    "curation_reward",
    {
      "comment_author": "positivesteem",
      "comment_permlink": "european-thursday-the-captivating-beauty-of-lake-baikal-siberia",
      "curator": "nishantd",
      "reward": "2.053882 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-16T14:40:18",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 36
}

{
  "block": 17211111,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-drwom-the-crypto-space-is-gearing-up-for-a-lift-off-20171107t092831525z",
      "sbd_payout": "0.008 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "20.541158 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-14T09:28:33",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 4
}

{
  "block": 17186275,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-sme-the-microloan-foundation-20171106t124636900z",
      "sbd_payout": "0.022 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "51.355164 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-13T12:46:39",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 3
}

{
  "block": 17119838,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "tezos-founders-sued-for-securities-fraud-in-potential-class-action",
      "sbd_payout": "0.000 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "57.524592 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T05:24:36",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 2
}

{
  "block": 17091375,
  "op": [
    "transfer",
    {
      "amount": "0.015 SBD",
      "from": "blocktrades",
      "memo": "refund by admin",
      "to": "nishantd"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-10T05:40:57",
  "trx_id": "d126aa87ccb7326a7ef42197767ddb028e9f7b96",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17091366,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "blocktrades",
      "body": "You sent 0.015 SBD, this is below our minimum delegatable amount (the blockchain limits us to a min delegation of 2 STEEM).",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"blocktrades\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "re-blocktrades-blocktrades-was-done-for-a-few-hours-due-to-large-scale-datacenter-network-issues-today-back-up-now-20171109t231934233z",
      "permlink": "re-nishantd-re-blocktrades-blocktrades-was-done-for-a-few-hours-due-to-large-scale-datacenter-network-issues-today-back-up-now-20171110t054031287z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-10T05:40:30",
  "trx_id": "f00c9fdd3c0c1205ded85e02f56807426c14b451",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17083942,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "good-karma",
      "permlink": "hardfork-failed",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T23:28:51",
  "trx_id": "9f27401d3db06f29c741fc7d7d00291273b64b84",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17083936,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "sweetsssj",
      "permlink": "travel-with-me-95-the-endangered-species-of-qinling-china-the-giant-panda-the-golden-takin",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T23:28:33",
  "trx_id": "4ecbec0675d1433ae8c1b3001b856822c06f315c",
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17083758,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "Hey a few hours ago I sent you guys sbd for delegated steempower, but I still have not received it.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"blocktrades\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "blocktrades",
      "parent_permlink": "blocktrades-was-done-for-a-few-hours-due-to-large-scale-datacenter-network-issues-today-back-up-now",
      "permlink": "re-blocktrades-blocktrades-was-done-for-a-few-hours-due-to-large-scale-datacenter-network-issues-today-back-up-now-20171109t231934233z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T23:19:36",
  "trx_id": "2d714400f151519ad1ff423a83b285db7c8c8d42",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073881,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "cryptofunk",
      "permlink": "steemfest-portugal-obrigado-steemians",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T15:05:09",
  "trx_id": "60e08c9ba08a8ffd58e1359ec0adba9ff9c5687f",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073867,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "travelaceh",
      "permlink": "travel-16-photograph-aceh-indonesia-nature-2017119t21537252z",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T15:04:27",
  "trx_id": "955c6cac3b2327463a7362d35092a8e0b868ffe1",
  "trx_in_block": 24,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073858,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "markwhittam",
      "permlink": "steemfest-and-the-steemit-roadshow-have-drawn-to-a-close-what-s-next-for-the-tinyhouse-family",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T15:04:00",
  "trx_id": "8ac9b4ef07ffa9fc803406729b8b7f9516009706",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073805,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "sunnylife",
      "permlink": "when-you-go-to-the-disco-exit",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T15:01:21",
  "trx_id": "c29430a1ce866764ba7177f35797ebd70f866198",
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073771,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "positivesteem",
      "permlink": "european-thursday-the-captivating-beauty-of-lake-baikal-siberia",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:59:39",
  "trx_id": "e898a0db444a01d264f5707ae41f288349f6f072",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073749,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "byronviljoen",
      "permlink": "colorchallenge-beautiful-trees",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:58:33",
  "trx_id": "107ddbd21b8c342d3c9c5a0a42bdc56535ddbd79",
  "trx_in_block": 16,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073747,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "wendygoh",
      "permlink": "malaysia-french-town-bukit-tinggi",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:58:27",
  "trx_id": "6084d26356509512b1c8acc77d61da026fa1f13a",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073733,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "revelim",
      "permlink": "igreja-de-sao-sebastiao-pinturas-primo-quinhentistas-church-of-sao-sebastiao-middle-ages-paintings-terceira-azores-pt",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:57:45",
  "trx_id": "562cffd415f2266d185d0a4219215a18ae00c0ca",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073727,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "sunscape",
      "permlink": "macrophotography-contest-entry-natures-geometry",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:57:27",
  "trx_id": "1b096b4578b0a477b4836edcaad41057d8581ba3",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073725,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "ngos",
      "permlink": "the-clue-to-what-type-of-aircraft-this-is-is-in-the-paint-job",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:57:21",
  "trx_id": "8e8ebdc54a923b68ff7ebddbf298208512167dac",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073674,
  "op": [
    "transfer",
    {
      "amount": "0.015 SBD",
      "from": "nishantd",
      "memo": "657a2136-5d4e-415a-ae29-a03e62cb04d7",
      "to": "blocktrades"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:54:48",
  "trx_id": "b2b1be750eaaf19d4769f809b19deceaa769c6e9",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17073602,
  "op": [
    "claim_reward_balance",
    {
      "account": "nishantd",
      "reward_sbd": "0.015 SBD",
      "reward_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
      "reward_vests": "39.038000 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T14:51:12",
  "trx_id": "2a195ead829b6b470b95b551aae3759e91a37331",
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17071213,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-klevn-re-vintherinvest-2017112t45015743z-20171102t125134615z",
      "sbd_payout": "0.015 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "34.928678 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T12:51:42",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 5
}

{
  "block": 17066180,
  "op": [
    "curation_reward",
    {
      "comment_author": "richreck",
      "comment_permlink": "re-stackin-bitcoin-rallies-to-another-record-high-of-usd7000-it-s-time-to-celebrate-20171102t083937508z",
      "curator": "nishantd",
      "reward": "2.054646 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T08:39:36",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 5
}

{
  "block": 17057950,
  "op": [
    "curation_reward",
    {
      "comment_author": "yabapmatt",
      "comment_permlink": "yabapmatt-s-witness-application",
      "curator": "nishantd",
      "reward": "2.054676 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-09T01:47:21",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 78
}

{
  "block": 17039650,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "sme",
      "body": "Very true!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"enterprise\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "re-sme-the-microloan-foundation-20171106t124636900z",
      "permlink": "re-nishantd-re-sme-the-microloan-foundation-20171108t102948985z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-08T10:29:51",
  "trx_id": "8d39cb06be7be95ee954b4df18cfc55b0d698082",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17039620,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-sme-the-microloan-foundation-20171106t124636900z",
      "voter": "sme",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-08T10:28:15",
  "trx_id": "8f38887fb1eb693e97747102aac4f404ec211f98",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17011535,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "drwom",
      "body": "Yep - it's certainly a case of *buyer beware* at the moment :-)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"cryptocurrency\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "re-drwom-the-crypto-space-is-gearing-up-for-a-lift-off-20171107t092831525z",
      "permlink": "re-nishantd-re-drwom-the-crypto-space-is-gearing-up-for-a-lift-off-20171107t110205905z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:02:00",
  "trx_id": "7e89c42638223eacf2f19121800d9d4b3ae651a3",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17011513,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-drwom-the-crypto-space-is-gearing-up-for-a-lift-off-20171107t092831525z",
      "voter": "drwom",
      "weight": 1900
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:00:54",
  "trx_id": "91a31c668bc62367b9e77e8ffb455dc53dad6cd7",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17009666,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "Crypto has a lot of roadblocks to get over before it can be considered ready for lift off. A lot of the ICOs are scams which hurts the credibilty of cryptos in general, many of them have raised millions of dollars without a tangible product. If they cannot fulfill their development timelines then it will ultimately invalidate the coin, making it worthless. There has to be some sort of regulation so that ICOs that launch are of a certain quality and investors can be certain that it is not a scam",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"cryptocurrency\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "drwom",
      "parent_permlink": "the-crypto-space-is-gearing-up-for-a-lift-off",
      "permlink": "re-drwom-the-crypto-space-is-gearing-up-for-a-lift-off-20171107t092831525z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T09:28:33",
  "trx_id": "7588f0dffca23f58146dc4b4f2a8971abadfa420",
  "trx_in_block": 25,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17007941,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "@@ -630,130 +630,4 @@\n ssed\n-, most of the times the article will have 5 views but 15 upvotes, which again just shows basically upvotes for the sake of it.\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"steem\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "mooncryption",
      "parent_permlink": "re-nishantd-re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t021630968z",
      "permlink": "re-mooncryption-re-nishantd-re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t074717216z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T08:02:18",
  "trx_id": "4e5f2451f4655079077559521d61284472a410e3",
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17007641,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "See thats the problem,  if you look at what I have posted there are two kinds of posts. One of them are word for word quotes from coindesk and the other are articles that I actually have taken the time to write. The ones that are direct quotes from coindesk have about 5 times as many upvotes as the ones that I have taken the time to write. This is bizarre why should copied content have more upvotes than something that I have actually taken the time to write. What happens is that it incentivizes people to post 'inorganic' content because that is simply what will get upvotes. It is definetly a problem that needs to be addressed, most of the times the article will have 5 views but 15 upvotes, which again just shows basically upvotes for the sake of it.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"steem\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "mooncryption",
      "parent_permlink": "re-nishantd-re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t021630968z",
      "permlink": "re-mooncryption-re-nishantd-re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t074717216z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T07:47:18",
  "trx_id": "322c42bd210a825f839ba8dedee08bb05e9d7020",
  "trx_in_block": 16,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17003327,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "voter": "fantomaska",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T04:11:33",
  "trx_id": "f209509efe12d0f10c566f802691a14d1b3f82df",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17003327,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "voter": "tanyakoval",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T04:11:33",
  "trx_id": "3df6a39716c591a17aa07c6ff52bbb507c2c8bdb",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17003327,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "voter": "eniasura",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T04:11:33",
  "trx_id": "b4edc5f716da35d89ab3c70a369196653a51e5ef",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17003319,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "voter": "bronislav",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T04:11:09",
  "trx_id": "56ee09f1d2c58f2de401d4a2cca7c0e968c75929",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17001027,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "mooncryption",
      "body": "Many bots help users get more attention and visibility such as @minnowbooster.\n\nAs for \"inorganic\", all of your posts are quoted word-for-word from CoinDesk.com; I appreciate that you put in the source link, but don't expect many votes when you simply copy paste an article from somewhere else.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"steem\"],\"users\":[\"minnowbooster\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t014044007z",
      "permlink": "re-nishantd-re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t021630968z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T02:16:30",
  "trx_id": "25538ccaa847539bbccf9f6e66aa0f98042d1d68",
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000333,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "@@ -108,9 +108,125 @@\n g pushed\n-.\n+ around. If steemit wants to be a social media platform, better content has to be upvoted than what we are seeing now\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"steem\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "mooncryption",
      "parent_permlink": "let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain",
      "permlink": "re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t014044007z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:41:45",
  "trx_id": "cc333d5bc347a0070fa7c83df43d58d379e4cfde",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000313,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "Bots should not be as powerful on the platform as they are. This has led to a lot of inorganic content being pushed.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"steem\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "mooncryption",
      "parent_permlink": "let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain",
      "permlink": "re-mooncryption-let-s-explore-stalk-the-steem-blockchain-20171107t014044007z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:40:45",
  "trx_id": "2d37cd07036bdec1c600b3d1dcd0b38dfcd8a5dc",
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000023,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "cheetah",
      "body": "Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:\nhttp://stagefrightmedia.com/why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail/",
      "json_metadata": "",
      "parent_author": "nishantd",
      "parent_permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "permlink": "cheetah-re-nishantdwhy-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:26:15",
  "trx_id": "5fd6a77e171d0ac62d92ed6782bb02bcb526ca42",
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000021,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "voter": "cheetah",
      "weight": 50
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:26:09",
  "trx_id": "ab3282a0256d6b7e52f4dd9d9d42d6f9bda8825f",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000016,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:25:54",
  "trx_id": "ef177af72b98217299c35ca69558ac2cf2c4c9bf",
  "trx_in_block": 23,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000016,
  "op": [
    "comment_options",
    {
      "allow_curation_rewards": true,
      "allow_votes": true,
      "author": "nishantd",
      "extensions": [],
      "max_accepted_payout": "1000000.000 SBD",
      "percent_steem_dollars": 0,
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:25:54",
  "trx_id": "ef177af72b98217299c35ca69558ac2cf2c4c9bf",
  "trx_in_block": 23,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 17000016,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "A much needed contrarian view on why Segwit 2x is bound to fail and looks at the widespread disunity in the bitcoin community\n\nhttps://www.coindesk.com/opinion-segwit2x-doomed-fail/\n\n![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmRyf7NnUicZkCQ7HN8tHv8z3MghcV9bNKGjFHCGox9Vyc/image.png)\n\nImage from Cryptocoinmastery\n\n>With two weeks remaining until it's slated to launch, all eyes are on the imminent hard fork of the bitcoin software: Segwit2x.\n\n>Its significance? The fear that it could initiate the largest and most contentious chain split that bitcoin, and perhaps any cryptocurrency, has yet seen. Such an event could have devastating consequences for the ecosystem and its wider perception.\n\n>However, a close analysis of the dynamics at play shows that these fears are largely overblown. More likely is the avoidance (or quick resolution) of such a split, one that will also serve as an important test that bolsters the perception of bitcoin as a secure store of value.\n\n>**Unprecedented circumstance**\n\n>A number of factors have contributed to escalating this situation and making it a completely unprecedented, and therefore one understandably shrouded in uncertainty.\n\n>Other controversial forks seeking to increase the block size have come and gone with little incident under the names of Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Classic and Bitcoin Unlimited. However, 2x differs from these previous attempts in two distinct and important ways.\n\n>The first is in its substantial backing. The scheduled 2x fork is the result of the \"New York Agreement\" between an impressive collection of major industry players including miners, wallets, exchanges and payment processors.\n\n>At its inception, the agreement claimed the participation of 58 companies located in 22 countries including many of the largest in the ecosystem, and 83.28% of miner hashing power. This represented the most significant push for any hard fork to increase the block size by far.\n\n>And while the agreement has lost a non-negligible amount of that support since it was first announced, the majority of its original signatories have not officially indicated a change in position.\n\n>The second and most important difference (one made even more significant by its aforementioned backing) is the NYA's break from the traditional conventions regarding changes to the bitcoin protocol. This has been the source of much of the contention and protest in the community.\n\n>Unlike previous attempts to change the bitcoin core protocol, Segwit2x was not introduced as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, but rather through the New York Agreement.\n\n>This is significant because bitcoin and all blockchains are strictly opt-in, consensus-based systems. For a backwards incompatible change to be implemented like a block size increase, the whole peer-to-peer network of bitcoin nodes must synchronously update its software to avoid splitting the blockchain and ecosystem.\n\n>For this reason, it is a standard and reasonable expectation for advocates of hard forks to attempt to do either one of two things. First, they can build widespread consensus in the ecosystem around the need for a backwards-incompatible change so as to avoid a confusing chain split. Or, if they cannot create such consensus, then they can enact replay protection – as bitcoin cash did – in order to cleanly split into a co-existing minority chain with minimal disruption to the ecosystem.\n\n>Segwit2x breaks this trend by declining to enact replay protection and also failing to publicly seek and build wider community support for the adoption of the software.\n\n>This is explained by the language of the original NYA announcement itself, which reveals a deeply flawed premise: that a consensus for such a change was already obtained since, \"The group of signed companies represents a critical mass of the bitcoin ecosystem.\"\n\n>**Far from consensus**\n\n>While the many large companies that originally signed on to Segwit2x may seem to represent a clear consensus amongst the majority of the ecosystem, new developments have proven this is anything but the case.\n\n>Firstly, the doubling of the block size that Segwit 2x solely exists to implement has been rejected by the vast majority of the open-source development community on technical grounds, and as such, is not being merged into Bitcoin Core, the most widely used and supported bitcoin client by far.\n\n>Several original signers of the agreement have since formally dropped their support. Most notably amongst these are the mining pools Slush and F2Pool, which together account for nearly 13% of hash power at time of publication.\n\n>Exchanges have also largely recognized \"legacy\" bitcoin, and after the fork, that Segwit2x coins will be treated as separate units of value. This is opposed to Segwit2x's original intention and goal, which was to seamlessly replace the current bitcoin protocol and the corresponding unit of value.\n\n>These developments alone are enough to, in my view, ensure 2x has little chance of ever overtaking and replacing the legacy chain for any considerable length of time. Let's explore why.\n\n>**Scheduled chaos**\n\n>Regardless of original intentions, if the Segwit2x fork took place tomorrow, with all its remaining signatories, the result would be a needless and ruinous debacle for bitcoin. With the strong contention of the fork between nodes, users and developers, two chains are guaranteed to co-exist and maintain monetary value.\n\n>This alone isn't normally a cause for alarm. However, this isn't a normal case. Without replay protection and with two chains maintaining independent monetary values, the loss of funds for many users on the network will literally be unavoidable due to accidental replay spending, replay attacks and sudden and widespread incompatibility between various software and services.\n\n>The only thing that is uncertain is how severe and continuous such a state of affairs proves to be and how much reputational damage bitcoin incurs as a result.\n\n>Needless to say, such a debacle would be immensely detrimental to the ecosystem and all its stakeholders, and is likely a far cry from what the Segwit2x signers originally envisioned and signed on to. Fortunately, the NYA is not only not binding, but its associated \"support\" and \"signaling\" equate to little more than flag waving.\n\n>Whether such supporters are ultimately willing to accept the economic consequences of following through with the split given the clear division regarding the fork is a separate question entirely.\n\n>These companies are ultimately profit-oriented and will live or die with the ecosystem, and it is doubtful that the repercussions of a deeply contentious fork without replay protection is lost on the majority of them. That this is being risked for a simple block size increase makes it an even more unsavory deal. To put it simply, circumstances have changed dramatically since the participating companies agreed to what then likely seemed like a safe and straightforward commitment.\n\n>That is why it is likely that the Segwit2x agreement will only continue to lose more support prior to the activation date. Indeed, perhaps the only reason that we haven't seen more of this already is that there is little incentive for these companies to be among the first to back out of their agreement while there remains time before they are required to actually act on it.\n\n>By virtue of this, should Segwit2x launch at all, it will likely debut with much less than currently advertised support. Thus, signers are faced with the actual risk and cost of following through given the clear division in the ecosystem.\n\n>**The market will decide**\n\n>Should Segwit2x emerge in any way besides being accepted by users and the market as the \"new\" and superior bitcoin as it originally set out to do, it will be reflected in its market price. The best indication of how that price might look like are coin split futures markets on several exchanges like Bitfinex, which roughly value a future Segwit2x coin at about 15% of the value of a bitcoin.\n\n>Regardless of initial miner signaling, a battle for hash power would quickly play out between the two chains that can ultimately only be determined by profitability. Because miners ultimately have large sunk and ongoing costs, hash power must ultimately follow the chain that is the most profitable to mine.\n\n>But how can we be sure that this continues to be the case and that the market will continue to value the legacy chain over Segwit2x, especially if an initial exodus of hash power renders transaction times painfully slow? What if, to add to this worst-case scenario, all the originally included companies actually went through with the agreement regardless of the risk to the ecosystem's and their own reputations, and are even willing to incur some amount of financial loss to do so?\n\n>A deeper analysis of the dynamics at play reveal that the NYA was flawed from the start by not only misunderstanding the nature of the network, but by also directly ignoring what makes a bitcoin valuable in the first place.\n\n>As such, Segwit2x could never have a chance at successfully overtaking bitcoin in market value regardless of the amount of corporate backing.\n\n>**A flawed outlook**\n\n>The New York Agreement was just that: an agreement among the involved parties. The error was in believing that they collectively had the ability to change the bitcoin protocol without any additional support as they represented a critical mass of the bitcoin ecosystem.\n\n>There are two important components to this erroneous conclusion.\n\n>Firstly is an overemphasis on the importance of hash power in measuring consensus and in achieving a successful fork. Miners provide an essential service and are large stakeholders in the ecosystem, but they are far from the only ones. Ultimately, the preferences of the rest of the ecosystem are aggregated and reflected in market prices, which miners can ignore but at a high cost that can't likely be incurred for long.\n\n>Secondly, and even more problematically, is the implicit assumption of Segwit2x that third-party services like Coinbase and BitPay can speak for their users, and can actually decide for them what token they would like to hold and use. Such thinking assumes the implicit consent of the users of all of these services to change the very definition of what a bitcoin is.\n\n>This goes against the very ethos of bitcoin, which was from its inception meant to do away with the need for participants to delegate this kind of trust and power to third parties.\n\n>Segwit2x was organized and advertised as a compromise in bitcoin's scaling debate. But it is only a compromise in an antiquated political sense, which understandably remains our only source of reference for when it comes to decentralized governance. But those same ideas and practices have no applicability in voluntary and consensus-based systems.\n\n>Blockchain protocol changes demand explicit, not implicit consent. So long as the cost of validating the network is low enough for most users to at least have the option to do so this will remain true.\n\n>Third parties may believe they can leverage their role as service providers and custodians to side-step this through attempts like Segwit2x, but they ultimately cannot force the network’s fully validating nodes to follow their new rules. Nor can they force their users or the wider market to demand their new token.\n\n>What necessarily follows from these facts is a new model of governance where politicking is supplanted by voluntary association, and the concept of representation is rendered obsolete by self-sovereignty. Segwit2x is a compromise the participants simply never had the power or authority to make.\n\n>If Segwit2x were to succeed in being collectively labeled as bitcoin, it must be despite the disagreement of the ecosystems vast majority of validating economic nodes.\n\n>This would mean that the coordinated actions of a few of the ecosystem’s large and visible players can unilaterally change the rules of the bitcoin protocol, a fact which would render bitcoin's reputation as a censorship-resistant store of value all but worthless.\n\n>Simply put, if these companies are successful in unilaterally changing the network rules without widespread consensus, then bitcoin would have failed.\n\n>For if such a contentious change can effectively be forced on the rest of the ecosystem then other changes can also be introduced despite protest, and States who are or become hostile to bitcoin will take notice. Pressuring those visible and key businesses in order to influence and control the network would be a straightforward and trivial attack surface.\n\n>Segwit2x seeks to provide temporary transaction fee relief by doubling the base block size. But without the underlying confidence in its security, resistance to change and continuity, the cost of a bitcoin transaction becomes irrelevant.\n\n>It would have lost the very thing that makes it worthwhile to transact in the first place.\n\n>The great experiment continues\n\n>While at first glance the difficulty in changing bitcoin seems to many to be a flaw, this couldn’t be farther from the truth.\n\n>Bitcoin’s resistance to change is what makes it so valuable in the first place.\n\n>Every time this property is demonstrated, it builds confidence in bitcoin’s reliability and security and reinforces its soundness as a store of value. That the economics of the network actively incentivizes this is what gives it the potential to become the most secure and trusted store of value in history. But it will only fulfill such potential if it can continue to demonstrate these properties in the face of ever larger threats to them.\n\n>2x isn’t the first such test, and it won’t be the last.\n\n>The choice between the legacy bitcoin and 2x is a choice between a continuously proven and non-censorable store of value, and a provenly compromised store of value with temporarily lower transaction fees.\n\n>If futures markets are any indication, then choice for the market is an easy one – and the result is clear: the Segwit2x hard fork is doomed to fail.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"bitcoin\",\"cryptocurrency\",\"blockchain\"],\"image\":[\"https://steemitimages.com/DQmRyf7NnUicZkCQ7HN8tHv8z3MghcV9bNKGjFHCGox9Vyc/image.png\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.coindesk.com/opinion-segwit2x-doomed-fail/\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "bitcoin",
      "permlink": "why-segwit2x-is-doomed-to-fail",
      "title": "Why Segwit2x Is Doomed to Fail"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T01:25:54",
  "trx_id": "ef177af72b98217299c35ca69558ac2cf2c4c9bf",
  "trx_in_block": 23,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16994663,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-kingscrown-sharpe-capital-ico-earn-eth-in-exchange-for-your-opinion-about-markets-and-assets-20171106t030459476z",
      "voter": "jedibofink",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T20:58:09",
  "trx_id": "68fbf11049bd41423b4b47342f92d84ec898c3b7",
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16985077,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "techblogger",
      "permlink": "ethereum-vitalik-introduces-a-modest-proposal",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T12:58:48",
  "trx_id": "aaad41f512a26d7d74b9c864f49c70741050641f",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16984834,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "body": "In most less developed countries, reputation plays a much bigger role in the ability to achieve financing rather than 'credit-worthiness'.  it definitely looks like it is going about micro financing the right way",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"enterprise\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}",
      "parent_author": "sme",
      "parent_permlink": "the-microloan-foundation",
      "permlink": "re-sme-the-microloan-foundation-20171106t124636900z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T12:46:39",
  "trx_id": "d06cdf6c5e4afa086f001f357d1e4d0eb7aeec6c",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16984784,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "sme",
      "permlink": "the-microloan-foundation",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T12:44:09",
  "trx_id": "bd0741969b7e72393dc2a8d51fe6338cdb451b2f",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16981396,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "davebrewer",
      "permlink": "re-kingscrown-sharpe-capital-ico-earn-eth-in-exchange-for-your-opinion-about-markets-and-assets-20171106t022959812z",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T09:54:42",
  "trx_id": "ce836e41d06b3cf3dd3548179a465476871a7e1f",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16977022,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "nishantd",
      "permlink": "re-kingscrown-sharpe-capital-ico-earn-eth-in-exchange-for-your-opinion-about-markets-and-assets-20171106t030459476z",
      "voter": "everydayman",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T06:16:00",
  "trx_id": "611891e4682d02858c1dd4c7eb33cb8ec9824d62",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16973595,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "contentjunkie",
      "permlink": "bjork-s-latest-album-available-only-with-cryptocurrencies-shows-adoption",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T03:24:36",
  "trx_id": "18765d3436fe40dc252dbc8e2d3509cd3761d8d8",
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

{
  "block": 16973498,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "traf",
      "permlink": "center-of-attention",
      "voter": "nishantd",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-06T03:19:45",
  "trx_id": "1829eef5ecfb80d90c11bb0d6674ab74305d62c3",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}