Ecoer Logo
VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS31.40%
Net Worth
2.458USD
STEEM
0.000STEEM
SBD
0.278SBD
Own SP
40.082SP

Detailed Balance

STEEM
balance
0.000STEEM
market_balance
0.000STEEM
savings_balance
0.000STEEM
reward_steem_balance
0.000STEEM
STEEM POWER
Own SP
40.082SP
Delegated Out
0.000SP
Delegation In
0.000SP
Effective Power
40.082SP
Reward SP (pending)
0.028SP
SBD
sbd_balance
0.248SBD
sbd_conversions
0.000SBD
sbd_market_balance
0.000SBD
savings_sbd_balance
0.000SBD
reward_sbd_balance
0.030SBD
{
  "balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "65187.649715 VESTS",
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "received_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "sbd_balance": "0.248 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "reward_sbd_balance": "0.030 SBD",
  "conversions": []
}

Account Info

nameoppy1984
id13026
rank0
reputation38943882929
created2016-06-20T20:53:36
recovery_accountsteem
proxyNone
post_count11
comment_count0
lifetime_vote_count0
witnesses_voted_for0
last_post2018-03-02T22:05:30
last_root_post2018-03-02T22:05:30
last_vote_time2017-11-11T00:41:12
proxied_vsf_votes0, 0, 0, 0
can_vote1
voting_power9,604
delayed_votes0
balance0.000 STEEM
savings_balance0.000 STEEM
sbd_balance0.248 SBD
savings_sbd_balance0.000 SBD
vesting_shares65187.649715 VESTS
delegated_vesting_shares0.000000 VESTS
received_vesting_shares0.000000 VESTS
reward_vesting_balance57.469319 VESTS
vesting_balance0.000 STEEM
vesting_withdraw_rate0.000000 VESTS
next_vesting_withdrawal1969-12-31T23:59:59
withdrawn0
to_withdraw0
withdraw_routes0
savings_withdraw_requests0
last_account_recovery1970-01-01T00:00:00
reset_accountnull
last_owner_update1970-01-01T00:00:00
last_account_update2017-11-26T11:11:00
minedNo
sbd_seconds0
sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
savings_sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
{
  "id": 13026,
  "name": "oppy1984",
  "owner": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM5ujdPy2Y8jxePBZZ8ffPtrCc9HsrznFH1TDED8HjTtRhxhhnwo",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "active": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM7LokSgTVdrXPRzoLMXsYBEFNQdo2qAwN5KP55VY7RnXGfTHxJt",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "posting": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6dTT9NvYjc9QAgKtWa4aBUDJcZEqNHJeLE3qu2PbmjasejYPrm",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "memo_key": "STM5bsdqE3FjywQKhCtnFvQNMkj8ZmYTKFfRHG4TqXmSvCAfpQhqt",
  "json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"name\":\"oppy1984\",\"location\":\"Ohio, USA\",\"website\":\"https://oppy1984.com/\"}}",
  "posting_json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"name\":\"oppy1984\",\"location\":\"Ohio, USA\",\"website\":\"https://oppy1984.com/\"}}",
  "proxy": "",
  "last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_account_update": "2017-11-26T11:11:00",
  "created": "2016-06-20T20:53:36",
  "mined": false,
  "recovery_account": "steem",
  "last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "reset_account": "null",
  "comment_count": 0,
  "lifetime_vote_count": 0,
  "post_count": 11,
  "can_vote": true,
  "voting_manabar": {
    "current_mana": 9604,
    "last_update_time": 1510360872
  },
  "downvote_manabar": {
    "current_mana": 0,
    "last_update_time": 1466456016
  },
  "voting_power": 9604,
  "balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "sbd_balance": "0.248 SBD",
  "sbd_seconds": "0",
  "sbd_seconds_last_update": "2016-07-08T01:41:06",
  "sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
  "savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
  "reward_sbd_balance": "0.030 SBD",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_vesting_balance": "57.469319 VESTS",
  "reward_vesting_steem": "0.028 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "65187.649715 VESTS",
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "received_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
  "withdrawn": 0,
  "to_withdraw": 0,
  "withdraw_routes": 0,
  "curation_rewards": 0,
  "posting_rewards": 2176,
  "proxied_vsf_votes": [
    0,
    0,
    0,
    0
  ],
  "witnesses_voted_for": 0,
  "last_post": "2018-03-02T22:05:30",
  "last_root_post": "2018-03-02T22:05:30",
  "last_vote_time": "2017-11-11T00:41:12",
  "post_bandwidth": 0,
  "pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
  "vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reputation": "38943882929",
  "transfer_history": [],
  "market_history": [],
  "post_history": [],
  "vote_history": [],
  "other_history": [],
  "witness_votes": [],
  "tags_usage": [],
  "guest_bloggers": []
}

Withdraw Routes

IncomingOutgoing
Empty
Empty
{
  "incoming": [],
  "outgoing": []
}
From Date
To Date
2019/06/20 21:40:54
authorsteemitboard
bodyCongratulations @oppy1984! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984/birthday3.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=oppy1984)_</sub> **Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:** <table><tr><td><a href="https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/the-steem-community-has-lost-an-epic-member-farewell-woflhart"><img src="https://steemitimages.com/64x128/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQWnM36SWCPGn98nY83M1ArgweMz5fnovQEp2E4FiDdug/Wolfhart_header.png"></a></td><td><a href="https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/the-steem-community-has-lost-an-epic-member-farewell-woflhart">The Steem community has lost an epic member! Farewell @woflhart!</a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://steemit.com/steemtoolbar/@steemitboard/steemtoolbar-update-display-bug-fixed"><img src="https://steemitimages.com/64x128/http://i.cubeupload.com/7CiQEO.png"></a></td><td><a href="https://steemit.com/steemtoolbar/@steemitboard/steemtoolbar-update-display-bug-fixed">SteemitBoard - Witness Update</a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitboard/do-not-miss-the-coming-rocky-mountain-steem-meetup-and-get-a-new-community-badge"><img src="https://steemitimages.com/64x128/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUphCGZFWgt6bJ1XTtunV7esnwy6bxnGqcLcHAV3NEqnQ/meetup-rocky-mountain.png"></a></td><td><a href="https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitboard/do-not-miss-the-coming-rocky-mountain-steem-meetup-and-get-a-new-community-badge">Do not miss the coming Rocky Mountain Steem Meetup and get a new community badge!</a></td></tr></table> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
parent authoroppy1984
parent permlinkhow-amazon-could-crush-google
permlinksteemitboard-notify-oppy1984-20190620t214053000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #33975479/Trx 6f7767e4c94bb2e04d04ab86afa66310d0d887cc
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33975479,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @oppy1984! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984/birthday3.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=oppy1984)_</sub>\n\n\n**Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:**\n<table><tr><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/the-steem-community-has-lost-an-epic-member-farewell-woflhart\"><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/64x128/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQWnM36SWCPGn98nY83M1ArgweMz5fnovQEp2E4FiDdug/Wolfhart_header.png\"></a></td><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/the-steem-community-has-lost-an-epic-member-farewell-woflhart\">The Steem community has lost an epic member! Farewell @woflhart!</a></td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemtoolbar/@steemitboard/steemtoolbar-update-display-bug-fixed\"><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/64x128/http://i.cubeupload.com/7CiQEO.png\"></a></td><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steemtoolbar/@steemitboard/steemtoolbar-update-display-bug-fixed\">SteemitBoard - Witness Update</a></td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitboard/do-not-miss-the-coming-rocky-mountain-steem-meetup-and-get-a-new-community-badge\"><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/64x128/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUphCGZFWgt6bJ1XTtunV7esnwy6bxnGqcLcHAV3NEqnQ/meetup-rocky-mountain.png\"></a></td><td><a href=\"https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitboard/do-not-miss-the-coming-rocky-mountain-steem-meetup-and-get-a-new-community-badge\">Do not miss the coming Rocky Mountain Steem Meetup and get a new community badge!</a></td></tr></table>\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "oppy1984",
      "parent_permlink": "how-amazon-could-crush-google",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-oppy1984-20190620t214053000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-20T21:40:54",
  "trx_id": "6f7767e4c94bb2e04d04ab86afa66310d0d887cc",
  "trx_in_block": 29,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2018/06/21 09:21:36
authorsteemitboard
bodyCongratulations @oppy1984! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : [![](https://steemitimages.com/70x80/http://steemitboard.com/notifications/posts.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984) Award for the number of posts published <sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub> <sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub> **Do not miss the [last post](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-argentina-vs-croatia) from @steemitboard!** --- **Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!** Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1) --- > Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
parent authoroppy1984
parent permlinkhow-amazon-could-crush-google
permlinksteemitboard-notify-oppy1984-20180621t092135000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #23512332/Trx 30203b466fae9a544a52c947a5fc176bd00aecb2
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 23512332,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @oppy1984! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :\n\n[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x80/http://steemitboard.com/notifications/posts.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984) Award for the number of posts published\n\n<sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub>\n<sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub>\n\n\n\n**Do not miss the [last post](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-argentina-vs-croatia) from @steemitboard!**\n\n---\n**Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!**\nCollect World Cup badges and win free SBD\nSupport the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1)\n\n---\n\n> Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "oppy1984",
      "parent_permlink": "how-amazon-could-crush-google",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-oppy1984-20180621t092135000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-06-21T09:21:36",
  "trx_id": "30203b466fae9a544a52c947a5fc176bd00aecb2",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2018/06/21 00:56:24
authorsteemitboard
bodyCongratulations @oppy1984! You have received a personal award! [![](https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984/birthday2.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984) 2 Years on Steemit <sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub> **Do not miss the [last post](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-argentina-vs-croatia) from @steemitboard!** --- **Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!** Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1) --- > Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
parent authoroppy1984
parent permlinkhow-amazon-could-crush-google
permlinksteemitboard-notify-oppy1984-20180621t005626000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #23502229/Trx 6628451477a2695109276f1387a1b74b30abd5a3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 23502229,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @oppy1984! You have received a personal award!\n\n[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984/birthday2.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@oppy1984)  2 Years on Steemit\n<sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub>\n\n\n**Do not miss the [last post](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-argentina-vs-croatia) from @steemitboard!**\n\n---\n**Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!**\nCollect World Cup badges and win free SBD\nSupport the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1)\n\n---\n\n> Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "oppy1984",
      "parent_permlink": "how-amazon-could-crush-google",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-oppy1984-20180621t005626000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-06-21T00:56:24",
  "trx_id": "6628451477a2695109276f1387a1b74b30abd5a3",
  "trx_in_block": 31,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2018/03/02 22:53:27
authoroppy1984
permlinkhow-amazon-could-crush-google
votersensation
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #20335258/Trx 8ec263eaf680b64cd6a245e5fec38499d46e400d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 20335258,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "how-amazon-could-crush-google",
      "voter": "sensation",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-02T22:53:27",
  "trx_id": "8ec263eaf680b64cd6a245e5fec38499d46e400d",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2018/03/02 22:43:21
authoroppy1984
permlinkhow-amazon-could-crush-google
votermoby-dick
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #20335056/Trx 6effbc23a580b95c24e47378a8686fb73fac851b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 20335056,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "how-amazon-could-crush-google",
      "voter": "moby-dick",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-02T22:43:21",
  "trx_id": "6effbc23a580b95c24e47378a8686fb73fac851b",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2018/03/02 22:05:30
authoroppy1984
bodyMy Problem I’m a Google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invested in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like OwnCloud on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn). Now if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services. So while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs. The Realization All this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google. There would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw that Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google, so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss. What Amazon would need to get people to switch This is the basic list of what I think Amazon would have to offer to get people to even think about switching. Obviously there would have to be mobile apps for all these as well, no one these days are going to make the switch if they can’t access their services on their phones and tablets. Email Gmail is one of the most popular email providers with it’s spam filtering, tags, archiving, and mobile apps, it’s by far the best, of course Amazon would have to match Gmail but they could do it if they tried. Calendar A calendar equivalent to to Google’s calendar is another essential must have, I know I use mine every day and I’m sure most other people do too. File Storage with Docs, Sheets and Slides Google Drive is how I store most documents and spreadsheets, most users are accustomed to having their documents, spreadsheets, and presentations all saved in Google Drive, not offering this would limit adoption significantly. There would also need to be a host of informational site for finance, sports,, ect. and these would have to be able to be easily tied in with documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. I like a lot of people who are into the stock market like to keep a spreadsheet of my holdings (limited as they are) and to plan future buys, and right now I use a clunky bit of code to pull Google Finance data into the spreadsheet, so not only would Amazon need to start offering a way to make spreadsheets but they would also have to offer a Google Finance like service for pulling data from. and that’s just me, other people run fantasy sports leagues on spreadsheets so having an all-in-one sports stats, scores, and news site would have to be a priority as well. Maps Everyone uses Google Maps, Amazon would have to offer great mapping services and give great directions. Of course if they do what I think they are going to do and set up their own fleet of delivery vehicles then they could just use those as mapping and photographing vehicles at the same time. Music This one is easy, Amazon already has Prime Music and if they allowed people to upload their own music (up to a limit equivalent to Google limit) then more people would use Prime Music over Google Music and the sales would follow. Also the Prime Music app needs updated, for me at least it’s a little buggy. Note Taking I switched from Evernote to Google Keep and while Keep is alright I would prefer something more like Evernote, Amazon could offer an easy to use note taking service with mobile apps and even have it tied in with it’s file storage service. RSS Reader Everyone remembers the death of Google Reader and there hasn’t really been a perfect replacement since, Amazon could offer a Google Reader replacement and win over a lot of users right away. Twitch YouTube has been shooting it’s self in the foot repeatedly the past few years and more and more people are looking for alternatives, Amazon already has Twitch so why not just turn it into the YouTube alternative and start aggressively recruiting content producers? There has been reports that YouTube has threatened to shut down channels that post on other services so just tell creators that they can post their videos anywhere they want and that they won’t have their channels shut down on Twitch. Also make the Twitch interface more like the YouTube interface to make the transition to Twitch easier for both creators and viewers. Blogging A lot of people use Blogger, this blog started out as a Blogger blog, the main thing people don’t like about Blogger is that it’s so limited compared to WordPress, so just offer a blogging platform for all users based on WordPress. The main thing Amazon would have to do to get more people to switch is make an easy to use migration tool that also handles 301 redirects. Business Suite Currently business services are kind of a piecemeal setup, you pick and choose what you want and need, and that’s fine back-end work. But if Amazon is to really take on Google they would also need a “one click and get it all” business suite like G Suite. Businesses already trust Amazon with AWS but they trust Google G Suite for email, calendar, file storage, and a multitude of other things, Amazon could leverage the trust they have with AWS and brand more businesses over to the Amazon ecosystem if they just put a little work into it. Next Steps Obviously Amazon can’t just stop there and expect to dominate Google, they would have to expand into more of Googles turf and keep innovating to stay ahead. Below are just some of the things I think Amazon would have to move into to really take on Google and dominate them. Site Hosting Amazon can already host sites but they don’t really advertise it, also from what I’ve seen it’s not a simple hosting service, it seems to be geared more towards IT and tech savvy people. Amazon would need to build a web host some simple anyone could build their own site, or at the very least get a WordPress blog set up with just a few clicks. This could also tie in with the free blog I suggested above, make it a simple few clicks to move your “myblog.amazon.com” blog to an Amazon hosted “myblog.com”. Domain Registration Google is a domain name registrar and it makes it easier than ever to get a domain name and blog going in one place, Amazon has to offer the same level of connivance if it wants to prove it can take on Google. Display ads Another core market that Google dominates is display ads with it’s AdWords and AdSence programs, Amazon would have to take on both products at once since really they go hand in hand. The only thing I would suggest is that they combine the two services under one name, this would streamline the operation for people like me who both run ads and display ads, having one central hub for both would be so much nicer than having to go between two sites (minor inconvenience that it is). Analytics If Amazon is going to offer an advertising network they will of course have to offer an analytics service as well, I’d say that this should be tied into the advertising network for a combined hub, but also allow users to just use the data analytics without using the advertising network is they so choose. Social Network Admittedly the social network game is difficult to get into, and Amazon would have to stay with it for the long haul, but just because Google Plus didn’t take off doesn’t mean there isn’t demand for a Facebook alternative. Amazon already has almost all of Facebook’s users as customers so if they were to build a social network that resembled Facebook and then didn’t make the mistake that Google did in pushing it down everyone throat people would check it out and probably decide that since they already have an Amazon account and the social network is now included they might as well give it a try. If Amazon were to tie in Twitch for video hosting, Amazon Photos for pictures, give a decent news feed, and a separate mobile app for the social network, I’d bet people would install it and use it. App Store Speaking of apps, Amazon really needs to upgrade their app store. Right now the Amazon app store is seen as a joke, by creating a more feature rich and unified app store like Google Play Amazon could shake the stigma of a bad app store and move one step closer to taking on Google. Android Phones While we’re talking about the app store we might as swell also talk about the Fire Phone, I think the reason the Fire Phone failed was because it pushed way to hard to sell Amazon products. I understand that Amazon wants to push people to the site to get them to buy, but very quickly that kind of pushing gets distasteful and drives people away, I know that the daily “Deal Alert” on my phone got old fast and I dug into my settings to turn off the notifications from the Amazon app. If Amazon were to try again and this time just keep it a simple Android phone with a lite Amazon skin and the core Amazon services installed I think people would be willing to give it a second chance, though I do think that Jeff Bezos would have to publicly say that they over reached the first time around but that they learn ed from their mistakes and it won’t happen again. There’s also the added benefit that Amazon could design and sell their own phone and offer a high quality phone at a price lower than similar phones currently on the market. Phone Service And while we’re talking about Apps and Phones why not offer a phone service like Google’s Project Fi. People are sick of paying $80 to $100 per month for service and options like Project Fi and Ting are gaining in popularity, if Amazon were to offer a service like that and not only allow their own phones on the network but other models on as well that would put them ahead of Project Fi in a heartbeat. All-In-One Messaging I like most Google users am still mad at Google for killing Google Hangouts, if Amazon were to create an all-in-one messaging service that could run on phones, tablets, and computers I know I’d switch right away. Offering this on top of everything else could be want tips the scales for a lot of people and brings them over to Amazon, even if they just dip their toe in the water at least it makes them aware of what Amazon had to offer. Browser Creating an Amazon branded browser would also help keep people in the ecosystem, more and more people are moving away from Chrome because it’s getting so bloated, if Amazon were to either work with Firefox to create an Amazon branded Firefox browser, or just create their own (though I’d suggest just working with Firefox) then the tie in with all the services and the all-in-one messaging could be seamless and make for a great experience for the end user and customer. Operating System Ok this is a little more “pie in the sky” but I’ll throw it in anyway, Amazon could create a Linux based operating system. If Amazon really though ahead they would design a computer, phone, and tablet operating system from the ground up. I know they already have the Android based Kindle Fire devices, but I’m talking about starting over completely and working from the ground up, sure they’d have to continue supporting the current devices, but the real work should go into the new all-in-one OS. Giving developers one OS to design for would be huge, and for the users being able to move from computer, to tablet, to phone and stay with the same system would be a game changer that even Google hasn’t been able to pull off. Amazon Fiber Let’s face it people generally hate their ISP’s and Google Fiber was seen as a beacon of hope, but they’ve seemed to stop and the ISP’s have won. Now with more and more Amazon fulfillment centers popping up there is a way for Amazon to run fiber lines form the centers to the homes and businesses all around it slowly moving further and further out until the majority of the population is connected via an Amazon Fiber connection. Pair that with an Amazon phone service and Amazon could be an even bigger household name than it ever would be as an eCommerce site. Echo Devices + Mesh WiFi Amazon already has the lead in the digital assistant market, sure the system needs some work (search, string commands together, contextual conversations, cast to other devices, shortcuts, ect.) but one thing that Amazon could do right away is take on Google WiFi by integrating a WiFi mesh network into the Amazon Echo devices. Home mesh networks are becoming popular very fast, I know I just set one up with Google WiFi and now have the best WiFi my home has ever had, if Amazon were to offer this feature with all it’s Echo devices it would be a huge two for one selling point. Having a WiFi mesh hub built into all the echo devices strewn around a home would be a nice convince for customers and would be a good selling point since then you’d only need once device for two functions instead of the current echo for digital assistant and WiFi mesh hub for the internet, plus it would make hooking up new echo’s even easier if it were all in one app. Smart Devices Amazon should get into the smart home game in an even bigger way, go after the Nest product line and offer Echo thermostats, Echo cameras (which they just started to dip their toes into), Echo fire and CO2 detectors, Echo video doorbells, and Echo home security systems. If the whole system tied in with the Alexa powered Echo devices it could be one seamless system from a company that doesn’t try to overprice everything and has some staying power. Conclusion Amazon has the power to take on Google on almost every front, and if they really wanted to, and they were to willing to stick with it for the long haul, they could give Google a challenge that no other tech company has been able to give them. The one thing I would suggest that Amazon stay away from is search, that really is Google’s domain and trying to take that on would be almost impossible, really pulling customers away with services outside of search would be the way to go. This also could have the side benefit of forcing Google to get it’s act together and stop angering it’s customers and then we’d have some real competition that would lead to some real innovation and ultimately be a huge win for customers of both companies which is the real benefit for everyone. I do want to say one last thing, if Amazon were to go down this path and really try to take on Google I would suggest that they also do everything they can do use and be open source. The reason I say this is closed sourced systems have less trust, and open source systems contribute back to the whole open source community and everyone wins in that scenario, plus it’s not bad from a P.R. standpoint.
json metadata{"tags":["oppy1984","google","amazon"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkhow-amazon-could-crush-google
titleHow Amazon could crush Google
Transaction InfoBlock #20334299/Trx 9bdd532dbc55a616a25844dffaad7ef4acbfe6ee
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 20334299,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "My Problem\n\nI’m a Google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products.  I moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem.\n\nThis is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invested in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to.  Sure I could build a server and run something like OwnCloud on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn).\n\nNow if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years?  I’m guessing the answer is no.  So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services.\n\nSo while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google.  Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs.\n\nThe Realization\n\nAll this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company.  Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support.  If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.\n\nThere would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw that Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google.  An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google, so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.\n\nWhat Amazon would need to get people to switch\n\nThis is the basic list of what I think Amazon would have to offer to get people to even think about switching.  Obviously there would have to be mobile apps for all these as well, no one these days are going to make the switch if they can’t access their services on their phones and tablets.\n\nEmail\n\nGmail is one of the most popular email providers with it’s spam filtering, tags, archiving, and mobile apps, it’s by far the best, of course Amazon would have to match Gmail but they could do it if they tried.\n\nCalendar\n\nA calendar equivalent to to Google’s calendar is another essential must have, I know I use mine every day and I’m sure most other people do too.\n\nFile Storage with Docs, Sheets and Slides\n\nGoogle Drive is how I store most documents and spreadsheets, most users are accustomed to having their documents, spreadsheets, and presentations all saved in Google Drive, not offering this would limit adoption significantly.\n\nThere would also need to be a host of informational site for finance, sports,, ect.  and these would have to be able to be easily tied in with documents, spreadsheets, and presentations.  I like a lot of people who are into the stock market like to keep a spreadsheet of my holdings (limited as they are) and to plan future buys, and right now I use a clunky bit of code to pull Google Finance data into the spreadsheet, so not only would Amazon need to start offering a way to make spreadsheets but they would also have to offer a Google Finance like service for pulling data from.  and that’s just me, other people run fantasy sports leagues on spreadsheets so having an all-in-one sports stats, scores, and news site would have to be a priority as well.\n\nMaps\n\nEveryone uses Google Maps, Amazon would have to offer great mapping services and give great directions.  Of course if they do what I think they are going to do and set up their own fleet of delivery vehicles then they could just use those as mapping and photographing vehicles at the same time.\n\nMusic\n\nThis one is easy, Amazon already has Prime Music and if they allowed people to upload their own music (up to a limit equivalent to Google limit) then more people would use Prime Music over Google Music and the sales would follow.  Also the Prime Music app needs updated, for me at least it’s a little buggy.\n\nNote Taking\n\nI switched from Evernote to Google Keep and while Keep is alright I would prefer something more like Evernote, Amazon could offer an easy to use note taking service with mobile apps and even have it tied in with it’s file storage service.\n\nRSS Reader\n\nEveryone remembers the death of Google Reader and there hasn’t really been a perfect replacement since, Amazon could offer a Google Reader replacement and win over a lot of users right away.\n\nTwitch\n\nYouTube has been shooting it’s self in the foot repeatedly the past few years and more and more people are looking for alternatives, Amazon already has Twitch so why not just turn it into the YouTube alternative and start aggressively recruiting content producers?  There has been reports that YouTube has threatened to shut down channels that post on other services so just tell creators that they can post their videos anywhere they want and that they won’t have their channels shut down on Twitch.  Also make the Twitch interface more like the YouTube interface to make the transition to Twitch easier for both creators and viewers.\n\nBlogging\n\nA lot of people use Blogger, this blog started out as a Blogger blog, the main thing people don’t like about Blogger is that it’s so limited compared to WordPress, so just offer a blogging platform for all users based on WordPress.  The main thing Amazon would have to do to get more people to switch is make an easy to use migration tool that also handles 301 redirects.\n\nBusiness Suite\n\nCurrently business services are kind of a piecemeal setup, you pick and choose what you want and need, and that’s fine back-end work.  But if Amazon is to really take on Google they would also need a “one click and get it all” business suite like G Suite.  Businesses already trust Amazon with AWS but they trust Google G Suite for email, calendar, file storage, and a multitude of other things, Amazon could leverage the trust they have with AWS and brand more businesses over to the Amazon ecosystem if they just put a little work into it.\n\nNext Steps\n\nObviously Amazon can’t just stop there and expect to dominate Google, they would have to expand into more of Googles turf and keep innovating to stay ahead.  Below are just some of the things I think Amazon would have to move into to really take on Google and dominate them.\n\nSite Hosting\n\nAmazon can already host sites but they don’t really advertise it, also from what I’ve seen it’s not a simple hosting service, it seems to be geared more towards IT and tech savvy people.  Amazon would need to build a web host some simple anyone could build their own site, or at the very least get a WordPress blog set up with just a few clicks.  This could also tie in with the free blog I suggested above, make it a simple few clicks to move your “myblog.amazon.com” blog to an Amazon hosted “myblog.com”.\n\nDomain Registration\n\nGoogle is a domain name registrar and it makes it easier than ever to get a domain name and blog going in one place, Amazon has to offer the same level of connivance if it wants to prove it can take on Google.\n\nDisplay ads\n\nAnother core market that Google dominates is display ads with it’s AdWords and AdSence programs, Amazon would have to take on both products at once since really they go hand in hand.  The only thing I would suggest is that they combine the two services under one name, this would streamline the operation for people like me who both run ads and display ads, having one central hub for both would be so much nicer than having to go between two sites (minor inconvenience that it is).\n\nAnalytics\n\nIf Amazon is going to offer an advertising network they will of course have to offer an analytics service as well, I’d say that this should be tied into the advertising network for a combined hub, but also allow users to just use the data analytics without using the advertising network is they so choose.\n\nSocial Network\n\nAdmittedly the social network game is difficult to get into, and Amazon would have to stay with it for the long haul, but just because Google Plus didn’t take off doesn’t mean there isn’t demand for a Facebook alternative.  Amazon already has almost all of Facebook’s users as customers so if they were to build a social network that resembled Facebook and then didn’t make the mistake that Google did in pushing it down everyone throat people would check it out and probably decide that since they already have an Amazon account and the social network is now included they might as well give it a try.  If Amazon were to tie in Twitch for video hosting, Amazon Photos for pictures, give a decent news feed, and a separate mobile app for the social network, I’d bet people would install it and use it.\n\nApp Store\n\nSpeaking of apps, Amazon really needs to upgrade their app store.  Right now the Amazon app store is seen as a joke, by creating a more feature rich and unified app store like Google Play Amazon could shake the stigma of a bad app store and move one step closer to taking on Google.\n\nAndroid Phones\n\nWhile we’re talking about the app store we might as swell also talk about the Fire Phone, I think the reason the Fire Phone failed was because it pushed way to hard to sell Amazon products.  I understand that Amazon wants to push people to the site to get them to buy, but very quickly that kind of pushing gets distasteful and drives people away, I know that the daily “Deal Alert” on my phone got old fast and I dug into my settings to turn off the notifications from the Amazon app.  If Amazon were to try again and this time just keep it a simple Android phone with a lite Amazon skin and the core Amazon services installed I think people would be willing to give it a second chance, though I do think that Jeff Bezos would have to publicly say that they over reached the first time around but that they learn ed from their mistakes and it won’t happen again.  There’s also the added benefit that Amazon could design and sell their own phone and offer a high quality phone at a price lower than similar phones currently on the market.\n\nPhone Service\n\nAnd while we’re talking about Apps and Phones why not offer a phone service like Google’s Project Fi.  People are sick of paying $80 to $100 per month for service and options like Project Fi and Ting are gaining in popularity, if Amazon were to offer a service like that and not only allow their own phones on the network but other models on as well that would put them ahead of Project Fi in a heartbeat.\n\nAll-In-One Messaging\n\nI like most Google users am still mad at Google for killing Google Hangouts, if Amazon were to create an all-in-one messaging service that could run on phones, tablets, and computers I know I’d switch right away.  Offering this on top of everything else could be want tips the scales for a lot of people and brings them over to Amazon, even if they just dip their toe in the water at least it makes them aware of what Amazon had to offer.\n\nBrowser\n\nCreating an Amazon branded browser would also help keep people in the ecosystem, more and more people are moving away from Chrome because it’s getting so bloated, if Amazon were to either work with Firefox to create an Amazon branded Firefox browser, or just create their own (though I’d suggest just working with Firefox) then the tie in with all the services and the all-in-one messaging could be seamless and make for a great experience for the end user and customer.\n\nOperating System\n\nOk this is a little more “pie in the sky” but I’ll throw it in anyway, Amazon could create a Linux based operating system.  If Amazon really though ahead they would design a computer, phone, and tablet operating system from the ground up.  I know they already have the Android based Kindle Fire devices, but I’m talking about starting over completely and working from the ground up, sure they’d have to continue supporting the current devices, but the real work should go into the new all-in-one OS.  Giving developers one OS to design for would be huge, and for the users being able to move from computer, to tablet, to phone and stay with the same system would be a game changer that even Google hasn’t been able to pull off.\n\nAmazon Fiber\n\nLet’s face it people generally hate their ISP’s and Google Fiber was seen as a beacon of hope, but they’ve seemed to stop and the ISP’s have won.  Now with more and more Amazon fulfillment centers popping up there is a way for Amazon to run fiber lines form the centers to the homes and businesses all around it slowly moving further and further out until the majority of the population is connected via an Amazon Fiber connection.  Pair that with an Amazon phone service and Amazon could be an even bigger household name than it ever would be as an eCommerce site.\n\nEcho Devices + Mesh WiFi\n\nAmazon already has the lead in the digital assistant market, sure the system needs some work (search, string commands together, contextual conversations, cast to other devices, shortcuts, ect.) but one thing that Amazon could do right away is take on Google WiFi by integrating a WiFi mesh network into the Amazon Echo devices.  Home mesh networks are becoming popular very fast, I know I just set one up with Google WiFi and now have the best WiFi my home has ever had, if Amazon were to offer this feature with all it’s Echo devices it would be a huge two for one selling point.  Having a WiFi mesh hub built into all the echo devices strewn around a home would be a nice convince for customers and would be a good selling point since then you’d only need once device for two functions instead of the current echo for digital assistant and WiFi mesh hub for the internet, plus it would make hooking up new echo’s even easier if it were all in one app.\n\nSmart Devices\n\nAmazon should get into the smart home game in an even bigger way, go after the Nest product line and offer Echo thermostats, Echo cameras (which they just started to dip their toes into), Echo fire and CO2 detectors, Echo video doorbells,  and Echo home security systems.  If the whole system tied in with the Alexa powered Echo devices it could be one seamless system from a company that doesn’t try to overprice everything and has some staying power.\n\nConclusion\n\nAmazon has the power to take on Google on almost every front, and if they really wanted to, and they were to willing to stick with it for the long haul, they could give Google a challenge that no other tech company has been able to give them.  The one thing I would suggest that Amazon stay away from is search, that really is Google’s domain and trying to take that on would be almost impossible, really pulling customers away with services outside of search would be the way to go.\n\nThis also could have the side benefit of forcing Google to get it’s act together and stop angering it’s customers and then we’d have some real competition that would lead to some real innovation and ultimately be a huge win for customers of both companies which is the real benefit for everyone.\n\nI do want to say one last thing, if Amazon were to go down this path and really try to take on Google I would suggest that they also do everything they can do use and be open source.  The reason I say this is closed sourced systems have less trust, and open source systems contribute back to the whole open source community and everyone wins in that scenario, plus it’s not bad from a P.R. standpoint.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"oppy1984\",\"google\",\"amazon\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "how-amazon-could-crush-google",
      "title": "How Amazon could crush Google"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-03-02T22:05:30",
  "trx_id": "9bdd532dbc55a616a25844dffaad7ef4acbfe6ee",
  "trx_in_block": 38,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
oppy1984received 0.030 SBD, 0.035 SP author reward for @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/30 00:52:51
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
sbd payout0.030 SBD
steem payout0.000 STEEM
vesting payout57.469319 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #17661416/Virtual Operation #3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17661416,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "sbd_payout": "0.030 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "57.469319 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-30T00:52:51",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 3
}
oppy1984updated their account properties
2017/11/26 11:11:00
accountoppy1984
json metadata{"profile":{"name":"oppy1984","location":"Ohio, USA","website":"https://oppy1984.com/"}}
memo keySTM5bsdqE3FjywQKhCtnFvQNMkj8ZmYTKFfRHG4TqXmSvCAfpQhqt
Transaction InfoBlock #17558638/Trx fedd260c2150d408d5ea2ccad169e5e4c8e24f81
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17558638,
  "op": [
    "account_update",
    {
      "account": "oppy1984",
      "json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"name\":\"oppy1984\",\"location\":\"Ohio, USA\",\"website\":\"https://oppy1984.com/\"}}",
      "memo_key": "STM5bsdqE3FjywQKhCtnFvQNMkj8ZmYTKFfRHG4TqXmSvCAfpQhqt"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-26T11:11:00",
  "trx_id": "fedd260c2150d408d5ea2ccad169e5e4c8e24f81",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
ramziaupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:42
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterramzia
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463229/Trx e71387028c3e97138e076c5e6aade9800148e998
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463229,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "ramzia",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:42",
  "trx_id": "e71387028c3e97138e076c5e6aade9800148e998",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
sipkoupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:15
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
votersipko
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463220/Trx 7c4dcaa5622b1e28f3096cd3ef2e934acf503125
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463220,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "sipko",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:15",
  "trx_id": "7c4dcaa5622b1e28f3096cd3ef2e934acf503125",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
marinasolvupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:12
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
votermarinasolv
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463219/Trx 41874f027ac84be31d9cc17e1d20a406ccd1f2e8
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463219,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "marinasolv",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:12",
  "trx_id": "41874f027ac84be31d9cc17e1d20a406ccd1f2e8",
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
matargupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:12
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
votermatarg
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463219/Trx 0bff9243c795994e62be8bcc66b06a186fa423bb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463219,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "matarg",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:12",
  "trx_id": "0bff9243c795994e62be8bcc66b06a186fa423bb",
  "trx_in_block": 16,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
tep4ekupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:12
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
votertep4ek
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463219/Trx 90d688cc80dd73145c2cf6a0656d29745359c808
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463219,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "tep4ek",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:12",
  "trx_id": "90d688cc80dd73145c2cf6a0656d29745359c808",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
nioretseupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:09
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voternioretse
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463218/Trx 7ecee6423eced883d68f5a7c26930e3295b6495b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463218,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "nioretse",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:09",
  "trx_id": "7ecee6423eced883d68f5a7c26930e3295b6495b",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
zerbosupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 03:39:09
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterzerbos
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17463218/Trx 514c5560c90f1c2ded1fb825739f2459cc0806d8
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17463218,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "zerbos",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T03:39:09",
  "trx_id": "514c5560c90f1c2ded1fb825739f2459cc0806d8",
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
needavoteupvoted (100.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 01:18:36
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterneedavote
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17460410/Trx e34cd57b8e749ce6490933769fcc863ee959d511
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17460410,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "needavote",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T01:18:36",
  "trx_id": "e34cd57b8e749ce6490933769fcc863ee959d511",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
lawyerupupvoted (1.00%) @oppy1984 / please-help
2017/11/23 01:13:51
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterlawyerup
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17460315/Trx 720c89e5bd29f423b9b19189ab18e991de3b4e72
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17460315,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "lawyerup",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T01:13:51",
  "trx_id": "720c89e5bd29f423b9b19189ab18e991de3b4e72",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/23 01:10:18
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterprimetimesports
weight2 (0.02%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17460244/Trx 86d7eea8544633c9b1e041666eed934733a267ee
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17460244,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "primetimesports",
      "weight": 2
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T01:10:18",
  "trx_id": "86d7eea8544633c9b1e041666eed934733a267ee",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/23 01:10:03
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterfivestargroup
weight2 (0.02%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17460239/Trx 4589797610eb8f5867ed70688c76b3c82b0dc907
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17460239,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "fivestargroup",
      "weight": 2
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T01:10:03",
  "trx_id": "4589797610eb8f5867ed70688c76b3c82b0dc907",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/23 00:59:03
authoroppy1984
permlinkplease-help
voterjusttryme90
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17460019/Trx a4c833b42935b2d83cc5b26d435810a5cfe35358
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17460019,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "voter": "justtryme90",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T00:59:03",
  "trx_id": "a4c833b42935b2d83cc5b26d435810a5cfe35358",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
oppy1984published a new post: please-help
2017/11/23 00:52:51
authoroppy1984
bodyWith black Friday and cyber Monday upon us I would like to ask a favor, I'm trying to support my site oppy1984.com through affiliate programs and advertising. As you shop for your holiday gifts please use my Amazon affiliate link, it will help me out and cost you nothing. Just follow the link below to get my Amazon affiliate link, and thank you for your help. http://oppy1984.com/support/
json metadata{"tags":["oppy1984"],"links":["http://oppy1984.com/support/"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkplease-help
titlePlease help.
Transaction InfoBlock #17459895/Trx a9df1d4fc887e97ce2b5ad8052474fd0f0703e0d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17459895,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "With black Friday and cyber Monday upon us I would like to ask a favor, I'm trying to support my site oppy1984.com through affiliate programs and advertising. As you shop for your holiday gifts please use my Amazon affiliate link, it will help me out and cost you nothing. Just follow the link below to get my Amazon affiliate link, and thank you for your help.\nhttp://oppy1984.com/support/",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"oppy1984\"],\"links\":[\"http://oppy1984.com/support/\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "please-help",
      "title": "Please help."
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-23T00:52:51",
  "trx_id": "a9df1d4fc887e97ce2b5ad8052474fd0f0703e0d",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/14 01:22:45
authoroppy1984
bodyThis was originally posted on my blog at oppy1984.com
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984 alexa amazon echo google google home siri","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
titleMy disappointment with Google Home
Transaction InfoBlock #17201397/Trx d31bb50da1796e73e4c1600489e3188e14b9677e
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17201397,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "This was originally posted on my blog at oppy1984.com",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984 alexa amazon echo google google home siri\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "title": "My disappointment with Google Home"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-14T01:22:45",
  "trx_id": "d31bb50da1796e73e4c1600489e3188e14b9677e",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:57
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voterzobenko
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118446/Trx 1060eeeaed2597987d2d96fb51df979c0aabd9b7
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118446,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "zobenko",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:57",
  "trx_id": "1060eeeaed2597987d2d96fb51df979c0aabd9b7",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:54
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voterprochtomar
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118445/Trx cbd82f78fa1c26199e2108054afd98e32d009a55
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118445,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "prochtomar",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:54",
  "trx_id": "cbd82f78fa1c26199e2108054afd98e32d009a55",
  "trx_in_block": 18,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:54
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
votervik121
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118445/Trx daf85d3d4b863037d2f18fd9dd16663ed0740da5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118445,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "vik121",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:54",
  "trx_id": "daf85d3d4b863037d2f18fd9dd16663ed0740da5",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:48
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voteregormalish
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118443/Trx 24015805cd867c87ba2b9b58c91345583e4c9dec
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118443,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "egormalish",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:48",
  "trx_id": "24015805cd867c87ba2b9b58c91345583e4c9dec",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:48
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voteralross
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118443/Trx 12c68b930111714b840560f4b89be0d2d268654e
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118443,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "alross",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:48",
  "trx_id": "12c68b930111714b840560f4b89be0d2d268654e",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:45
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voterolgatookun
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118442/Trx e929e698c39db566211cdfb68d7bbde3e3d0c5d1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118442,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "olgatookun",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:45",
  "trx_id": "e929e698c39db566211cdfb68d7bbde3e3d0c5d1",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:45
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
votertyq42
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118442/Trx e185348de66610cf92289c5ee27817de5365a3b1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118442,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "tyq42",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:45",
  "trx_id": "e185348de66610cf92289c5ee27817de5365a3b1",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:42
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voterappi
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118441/Trx 8c23496f5b1cccaf563caaa25f735ae225480269
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118441,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "appi",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:42",
  "trx_id": "8c23496f5b1cccaf563caaa25f735ae225480269",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 04:14:39
authoroppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
voterlevomarym
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17118440/Trx d42254c0d3200288b5c409acfe2dd3c3b8b4fe98
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17118440,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "voter": "levomarym",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T04:14:39",
  "trx_id": "d42254c0d3200288b5c409acfe2dd3c3b8b4fe98",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 01:28:33
allow curation rewardstrue
allow votestrue
authoroppy1984
extensions[[0,{"beneficiaries":[{"account":"steemful","weight":1500}]}]]
max accepted payout1000000.000 SBD
percent steem dollars10000
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
Transaction InfoBlock #17115118/Trx 66300ec65887da7cbfca4d0d2c7ea5b0304f5e21
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17115118,
  "op": [
    "comment_options",
    {
      "allow_curation_rewards": true,
      "allow_votes": true,
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "extensions": [
        [
          0,
          {
            "beneficiaries": [
              {
                "account": "steemful",
                "weight": 1500
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      ],
      "max_accepted_payout": "1000000.000 SBD",
      "percent_steem_dollars": 10000,
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T01:28:33",
  "trx_id": "66300ec65887da7cbfca4d0d2c7ea5b0304f5e21",
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 01:28:33
authoroppy1984
bodyThis was originally posted on my blog at oppy1984.com
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984 alexa amazon echo google google home siri","canonical":"http://oppy1984.com/?p=2130","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkmy-disappointment-with-google-home
titleMy disappointment with Google Home
Transaction InfoBlock #17115118/Trx 77b76e2f20d9aab05d315c85a810a28ba253df42
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17115118,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "This was originally posted on my blog at oppy1984.com",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984 alexa amazon echo google google home siri\",\"canonical\":\"http://oppy1984.com/?p=2130\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "my-disappointment-with-google-home",
      "title": "My disappointment with Google Home"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T01:28:33",
  "trx_id": "77b76e2f20d9aab05d315c85a810a28ba253df42",
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 00:41:12
authorstellabelle
permlinkfind-out-why-mikepm74-just-won-10-000-sp-delegation-from-me
voteroppy1984
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17114171/Trx 69a0d86a9854c021a4ebff1a1ea7b76f05d38b1e
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17114171,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "stellabelle",
      "permlink": "find-out-why-mikepm74-just-won-10-000-sp-delegation-from-me",
      "voter": "oppy1984",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T00:41:12",
  "trx_id": "69a0d86a9854c021a4ebff1a1ea7b76f05d38b1e",
  "trx_in_block": 29,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/11 00:41:06
authorstellabelle
permlinki-just-won-fucktokens-on-twitter
voteroppy1984
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17114169/Trx c5f17b23aa1ae048a4b08622c659da2c898d6e4a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17114169,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "stellabelle",
      "permlink": "i-just-won-fucktokens-on-twitter",
      "voter": "oppy1984",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-11T00:41:06",
  "trx_id": "c5f17b23aa1ae048a4b08622c659da2c898d6e4a",
  "trx_in_block": 29,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/08 10:22:27
authoroppy1984
body## # My Problem I’m a [Google](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google) user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of [Google product](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products)s, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invested in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn). Now if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services. So while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across [Amazon AWS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Web_Services) and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs. ## # The Realisation All this got me thinking, [Amazon](http://amazon.com/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?tag=oppy19840f-20&linkId=57b51b91c00db14f6fd93337afe4b0d4&linkCode=ktl)![](https://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?source=bk&t=oppy19840f-20&bm-id=default&l=ktl&linkId=57b51b91c00db14f6fd93337afe4b0d4&_cb=1510135759115) already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google. There would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw that Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google, so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss. This was originally posted on my blog at oppy1984.com
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
titleHow Amazon could crush Google
Transaction InfoBlock #17039510/Trx 95fd31145436a75d89576dd9d93e73ef27147857
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17039510,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "##\n# My Problem\n\nI’m a [Google](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google) user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of [Google product](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products)s, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem.\n\nThis is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invested in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn).\n\nNow if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services.\n\nSo while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across [Amazon AWS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Web_Services) and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs.\n\n##\n# The Realisation\n\nAll this got me thinking, [Amazon](http://amazon.com/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?tag=oppy19840f-20&linkId=57b51b91c00db14f6fd93337afe4b0d4&linkCode=ktl)![](https://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?source=bk&t=oppy19840f-20&bm-id=default&l=ktl&linkId=57b51b91c00db14f6fd93337afe4b0d4&_cb=1510135759115) already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.\n\nThere would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw that Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google, so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.\nThis was originally posted on my blog at oppy1984.com",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "title": "How Amazon could crush Google"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-08T10:22:27",
  "trx_id": "95fd31145436a75d89576dd9d93e73ef27147857",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:26:00
authoroppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterevaveligush
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015613/Trx 68bc83186921df46979467cbbcf1b59cdf100e00
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015613,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "evaveligush",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:26:00",
  "trx_id": "68bc83186921df46979467cbbcf1b59cdf100e00",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:22:24
authoroppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterboulbahoxa
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015541/Trx b91db5638eaae1023a0d077ff5ffb448dbd638d8
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015541,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "boulbahoxa",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:22:24",
  "trx_id": "b91db5638eaae1023a0d077ff5ffb448dbd638d8",
  "trx_in_block": 19,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:22:24
authoroppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
votervolchkova
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015541/Trx a7e09a2cdc4b3f43c596a16603128e8371b048eb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015541,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "volchkova",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:22:24",
  "trx_id": "a7e09a2cdc4b3f43c596a16603128e8371b048eb",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:45
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
votermaratkorot
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015348/Trx a355a6d0faffffe40ce3e2ffd0cab69dcfbafd17
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015348,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "maratkorot",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:45",
  "trx_id": "a355a6d0faffffe40ce3e2ffd0cab69dcfbafd17",
  "trx_in_block": 31,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:45
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
votervolkovalex1979
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015348/Trx 1991aa368b728e2c1123f34556a5fa3d2e682ac7
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015348,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "volkovalex1979",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:45",
  "trx_id": "1991aa368b728e2c1123f34556a5fa3d2e682ac7",
  "trx_in_block": 24,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:45
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterjasnk
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015348/Trx 10a2accde9aebf450848522ca034e726529c45ab
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015348,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "jasnk",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:45",
  "trx_id": "10a2accde9aebf450848522ca034e726529c45ab",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:42
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
votervereneyts
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015347/Trx b6bbe689ce174fb5964d6148542acd590d863279
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015347,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "vereneyts",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:42",
  "trx_id": "b6bbe689ce174fb5964d6148542acd590d863279",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:39
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterjancutish
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015346/Trx b023c4c94bcefcdd970181361f74d4551496c0db
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015346,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "jancutish",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:39",
  "trx_id": "b023c4c94bcefcdd970181361f74d4551496c0db",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:39
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterakilova.sveta
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015346/Trx fd243ad492bea387b01bedf818d374c8756a9692
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015346,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "akilova.sveta",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:39",
  "trx_id": "fd243ad492bea387b01bedf818d374c8756a9692",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:39
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterlepetov
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015346/Trx 6de9915ad7dc4d20132f63357076fc5d71edf2dd
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015346,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "lepetov",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:39",
  "trx_id": "6de9915ad7dc4d20132f63357076fc5d71edf2dd",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:12:36
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterdicheva75
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015345/Trx d32dc62374e4e39a3b0dfe24539220c951668c9a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015345,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "dicheva75",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:12:36",
  "trx_id": "d32dc62374e4e39a3b0dfe24539220c951668c9a",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:09:57
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voteralena83
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015292/Trx 32d3da36eab463583d89d190acb9e2edd0d796fb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015292,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "alena83",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:09:57",
  "trx_id": "32d3da36eab463583d89d190acb9e2edd0d796fb",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:09:54
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterbulatovazat
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015291/Trx c61727182283208d8b5721ee2d6e22b2f4f7867c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015291,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "bulatovazat",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:09:54",
  "trx_id": "c61727182283208d8b5721ee2d6e22b2f4f7867c",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:09:51
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
votersartor
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015290/Trx 1d0c2b3d13f8e066ef2d37dd47e4ea7f2625816a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015290,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "sartor",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:09:51",
  "trx_id": "1d0c2b3d13f8e066ef2d37dd47e4ea7f2625816a",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 14:09:48
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterdymovaya
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17015289/Trx 6e2ae717ce4e8ce2978ce4cf3c29efa71cc02ad5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17015289,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "dymovaya",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T14:09:48",
  "trx_id": "6e2ae717ce4e8ce2978ce4cf3c29efa71cc02ad5",
  "trx_in_block": 22,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:47:15
authoroppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterubg
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17012440/Trx 94ef26b1d549d7c9fc7966598c8042290445eabd
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17012440,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "ubg",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:47:15",
  "trx_id": "94ef26b1d549d7c9fc7966598c8042290445eabd",
  "trx_in_block": 19,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:42:57
authoroppy1984
body## # My Problem I’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn). Now if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services. So while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs. ## # The Realisation All this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google. There would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw they Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
titleHow Amazon could crush Google
Transaction InfoBlock #17012354/Trx 165e678de030c53cd2a0ce3c83bfdb31f2d660a1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17012354,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "##\n# My Problem\n\nI’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem.\n\nThis is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn).\n\nNow if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services.\n\nSo while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs.\n\n##\n# The Realisation\n\nAll this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.\n\nThere would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw they Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "title": "How Amazon could crush Google"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:42:57",
  "trx_id": "165e678de030c53cd2a0ce3c83bfdb31f2d660a1",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:41:54
authoroppy1984
body## # My Problem I’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn). Now if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services. So while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs. ## # The Realisation All this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google. There would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw they Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
titleHow Amazon could crush Google
Transaction InfoBlock #17012333/Trx b953a3c6127f1182043fe63d4e897d4611be45aa
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17012333,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "##\n# My Problem\n\nI’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem.\n\nThis is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn).\n\nNow if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services.\n\nSo while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs.\n\n##\n# The Realisation\n\nAll this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.\n\nThere would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw they Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "title": "How Amazon could crush Google"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:41:54",
  "trx_id": "b953a3c6127f1182043fe63d4e897d4611be45aa",
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:37:03
authoroppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
voterubg
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #17012236/Trx ed85f6928d0f190d61317e6b0ea849281bb2b52c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17012236,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "voter": "ubg",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:37:03",
  "trx_id": "ed85f6928d0f190d61317e6b0ea849281bb2b52c",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:29:15
allow curation rewardstrue
allow votestrue
authoroppy1984
extensions[[0,{"beneficiaries":[{"account":"steemful","weight":1500}]}]]
max accepted payout1000000.000 SBD
percent steem dollars10000
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
Transaction InfoBlock #17012080/Trx ba79415b919bf493bd52042a53344a15ad19d36b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17012080,
  "op": [
    "comment_options",
    {
      "allow_curation_rewards": true,
      "allow_votes": true,
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "extensions": [
        [
          0,
          {
            "beneficiaries": [
              {
                "account": "steemful",
                "weight": 1500
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      ],
      "max_accepted_payout": "1000000.000 SBD",
      "percent_steem_dollars": 10000,
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:29:15",
  "trx_id": "ba79415b919bf493bd52042a53344a15ad19d36b",
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:29:15
authoroppy1984
body## # My Problem I’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn). Now if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services. So while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs. ## # The Realisation All this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google. There would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw they Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkre-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
titleHow Amazon could crush Google
Transaction InfoBlock #17012080/Trx edf3c10a94e255f8fa8803133f885d83d3d0d72c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17012080,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "##\n# My Problem\n\nI’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem.\n\nThis is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and possess computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn).\n\nNow if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services I currently use one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services.\n\nSo while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m willing to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs.\n\n##\n# The Realisation\n\nAll this got me thinking, Amazon already has the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate them back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support. If Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.\n\nThere would be slow adoption rate at first but once people saw they Amazon was sticking with it and enough early adopters started talking about it more and more people would start using Amazon services over Google. An big key would be data transfer, no one wants to just leave everything they’ve got on Google so Amazon would have to set up enough equivalent products that Google users could use Google Takeout and use an easy uploader on Amazon to migrate their data without loss.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re-oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "title": "How Amazon could crush Google"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:29:15",
  "trx_id": "edf3c10a94e255f8fa8803133f885d83d3d0d72c",
  "trx_in_block": 18,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:17:57
allow curation rewardstrue
allow votestrue
authoroppy1984
extensions[[0,{"beneficiaries":[{"account":"steemful","weight":1500}]}]]
max accepted payout1000000.000 SBD
percent steem dollars10000
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
Transaction InfoBlock #17011854/Trx c31b877ddd25271d1dff49bc386f2ba3ca920ba1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17011854,
  "op": [
    "comment_options",
    {
      "allow_curation_rewards": true,
      "allow_votes": true,
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "extensions": [
        [
          0,
          {
            "beneficiaries": [
              {
                "account": "steemful",
                "weight": 1500
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      ],
      "max_accepted_payout": "1000000.000 SBD",
      "percent_steem_dollars": 10000,
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:17:57",
  "trx_id": "c31b877ddd25271d1dff49bc386f2ba3ca920ba1",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/07 11:17:54
authoroppy1984
body## # My Problem I’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and posses computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn). Now if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services. So while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m will to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs. ## # The Realisation All this got me thinking, Amazon already have the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support, and if Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","canonical":"http://oppy1984.com/?p=2121","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkre--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z
titleHow Amazon could crush Google
Transaction InfoBlock #17011853/Trx 0c72a3768f0964bdc4818d91680cb109aecaff4f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 17011853,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "##\n# My Problem\n\nI’m a google user (who isn’t now a days?) and I rely on a lot of Google products, but I’m also loosing faith in Google because they keep putting out half baked products then when not enough users use them they kill the products. I’ve moved away from Microsoft two years ago due to privacy concerns and the unethical rolled out of Windows 10, and it was easier because I was already heavily invested in the Google ecosystem.\n\nThis is where my problem comes in, because I’m so heavily invest in the Google ecosystem I’m kind of stuck, there really isn’t any other platform with equivalent services to Google for me to move to. Sure I could build a server and run something like [OwnCloud](https://owncloud.org/) on it and have most of the things I need, but that requires me to spend a decent amount of money, and posses computing knowledge I don’t have (though I’m sure I could learn).\n\nNow if I want a managed suite of products like the Google services one thing I’m going to to look for is staying power, I’m sure there are a bunch of companies trying to offer all the services I want, but will they be around in five years? I’m guessing the answer is no. So whether I like it or not it looks like I’m going to have to bow down to our corporate overlords for these services.\n\nSo while I’ve been on the hunt for a new corporate overlord I came across Amazon AWS and found that they offer a lot of the same services for their business clients, but they don’t offer the free services like Google. Don’t get me wrong, for a low monthly fee I’m will to pay to get what I need, the problem is AWS seems a little scattershot and really is more focused on business, so it really doesn’t fit my needs.\n\n##\n# The Realisation\n\nAll this got me thinking, Amazon already have the basic infrastructure to take on Google, with a little work they could beat Google at their own game and relegate back to what they started off as, a search company. Right now Google is building up ill will by pushing out half baked products, killing beloved products, and being notorious for their lack of customer support, and if Amazon were to take things they already have, AWS, Prime services, and Twitch and put them together into a consumer grade offering, they could start pulling users from Google.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"canonical\":\"http://oppy1984.com/?p=2121\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "re--oppy1984-20171107t111756071z",
      "title": "How Amazon could crush Google"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-07T11:17:54",
  "trx_id": "0c72a3768f0964bdc4818d91680cb109aecaff4f",
  "trx_in_block": 23,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 10:24:27
authoroppy1984
bodyThis post can be found on my blog at oppy1984.com
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984 college football playoff fbs ncaa power fiver power five","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16953213/Trx 4a023117bba8c0286d1a3ddb06a6ec4a2552235c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16953213,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "This post can be found on my blog at oppy1984.com",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984 college football playoff fbs ncaa power fiver power five\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T10:24:27",
  "trx_id": "4a023117bba8c0286d1a3ddb06a6ec4a2552235c",
  "trx_in_block": 19,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:37:36
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), and [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each conference game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called and upheld on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion There is a clear bias against smaller teams in the current system and while that does make sure that popular big name teams always make the playoffs, it shuts out a significant amount of teams who if given the chance may be able to play a better game and make college football not only more competitive but also more entertaining. By taking the bias of people voting out of the equation and basing rankings solely on metrics it makes the ranking system more fair and encourages more competitiveness. If you have any thoughts positive or negative about my ideas please comment and let me know.
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16952276/Trx 616822ae71ad2f8ddaba463787a2eedf1a403b0d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16952276,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start.\n\nCurrently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), and [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each conference game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called and upheld on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion\n\nThere is a clear bias against smaller teams in the current system and while that does make sure that popular big name teams always make the playoffs, it shuts out a significant amount of teams who if given the chance may be able to play a better game and make college football not only more competitive but also more entertaining.\n\nBy taking the bias of people voting out of the equation and basing rankings solely on metrics it makes the ranking system more fair and encourages more competitiveness.\n\nIf you have any thoughts positive or negative about my ideas please comment and let me know.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:37:36",
  "trx_id": "616822ae71ad2f8ddaba463787a2eedf1a403b0d",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:37:03
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), and [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each conference game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called and upheld on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion There is a clear bias against smaller teams in the current system and while that does make sure that popular big name teams always make the playoffs, it shuts out a significant amount of teams who if given the chance may be able to play a better game and make college football not only more competitive but also more entertaining. By taking the bias of people voting out of the equation and basing rankings solely on metrics it makes the ranking system more fair and encourages more competitiveness. If you have any thoughts positive or negative about my ideas please comment and let me know.
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16952265/Trx 69deedf6966cd8350cb49ab6e73bfa4c7190d2cf
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16952265,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start.\n\nCurrently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), and [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each conference game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called and upheld on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion\n\nThere is a clear bias against smaller teams in the current system and while that does make sure that popular big name teams always make the playoffs, it shuts out a significant amount of teams who if given the chance may be able to play a better game and make college football not only more competitive but also more entertaining. By taking the bias of people voting out of the equation and basing rankings solely on metrics it makes the ranking system more fair and encourages more competitiveness.\n\nIf you have any thoughts positive or negative about my ideas please comment and let me know.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:37:03",
  "trx_id": "69deedf6966cd8350cb49ab6e73bfa4c7190d2cf",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:25:30
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), and [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16952034/Trx 7202b26192c1d49b5f4cf588e72767f672d4a873
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16952034,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start.\n\nCurrently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), and [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:25:30",
  "trx_id": "7202b26192c1d49b5f4cf588e72767f672d4a873",
  "trx_in_block": 19,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:23:57
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16952003/Trx f178ed9c5ce9ed5d0fb82c903a0446a9a6cb060d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16952003,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start.\n\nCurrently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:23:57",
  "trx_id": "f178ed9c5ce9ed5d0fb82c903a0446a9a6cb060d",
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:22:45
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16951979/Trx d231e1da3aa35f036e7deef19de69c1c062bb7b7
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16951979,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want they could change rules (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules), block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:22:45",
  "trx_id": "d231e1da3aa35f036e7deef19de69c1c062bb7b7",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:21:36
authoroppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
voterfivestargroup
weight2 (0.02%)
Transaction InfoBlock #16951956/Trx f8032569b3a22a7537197b9aefc529af4a1f488b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16951956,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "voter": "fivestargroup",
      "weight": 2
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:21:36",
  "trx_id": "f8032569b3a22a7537197b9aefc529af4a1f488b",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 09:20:30
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16951934/Trx cce9a56672f1d56fbb480872f3618c1465f29fb9
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16951934,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T09:20:30",
  "trx_id": "cce9a56672f1d56fbb480872f3618c1465f29fb9",
  "trx_in_block": 39,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:26:57
authoroppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
votersusannav
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #16948464/Trx 0539f9e42c1ae3680a81cdd2e0590797a49ca46f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948464,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "voter": "susannav",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:26:57",
  "trx_id": "0539f9e42c1ae3680a81cdd2e0590797a49ca46f",
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:26:57
authoroppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
voterkreglova
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #16948464/Trx b565a79d9a2d76dc42c3aef7e55aa8a638ee6c09
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948464,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "voter": "kreglova",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:26:57",
  "trx_id": "b565a79d9a2d76dc42c3aef7e55aa8a638ee6c09",
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:26:54
authoroppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
voterggs54
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #16948463/Trx 5abd46c8955f44d20332fc99663c2bfa33ad863f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948463,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "voter": "ggs54",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:26:54",
  "trx_id": "5abd46c8955f44d20332fc99663c2bfa33ad863f",
  "trx_in_block": 18,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:26:15
authoroppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
voterlidamagun
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #16948450/Trx 64a3166a6fb094a63ac27089caada32ecc2c5909
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948450,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "voter": "lidamagun",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:26:15",
  "trx_id": "64a3166a6fb094a63ac27089caada32ecc2c5909",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:22:06
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16948367/Trx 34814bea003b50752cb00640a57db27028cdcaf8
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948367,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:22:06",
  "trx_id": "34814bea003b50752cb00640a57db27028cdcaf8",
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:16:57
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16948264/Trx 3e23771d129b7ed012c248fe7ecad72beb5300ea
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948264,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and OSU is a member of the Big Ten_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:16:57",
  "trx_id": "3e23771d129b7ed012c248fe7ecad72beb5300ea",
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:14:57
authoroppy1984
body_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and at the time of writing OSU is ranked #6_ ## # The Problem The [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out. There is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit. ## # The Basics Currently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below: - [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference) - [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference) - [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference) - [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference) - [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA) - [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference) - [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference) - [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference) - [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference) - [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference) \*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame) Currently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee. As you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences. ## # What Should Be Done First of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias. ##### # Rankings The ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this: - Rankings are only determined from conference games\* - Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs - Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team - For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score - Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score - Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2 - If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points \*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs. ##### # Conferences At the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship. ##### # The Playoffs The playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round. The Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this: ![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg) ## # Conclusion
json metadata{"tags":"oppy1984","app":"wp-steem/1.0.5","community":"blogs"}
parent author
parent permlinkoppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
titleThe College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it
Transaction InfoBlock #16948224/Trx 1671d15cec12da68460a2446cf5e4e7520b94919
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948224,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "body": "_Full Disclosure: I am a Ohio State fan and at the time of writing OSU is ranked #6_\n\n##\n# The Problem\n\nThe [College Football Playoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff) ranking system that is currently used is unfair and bias and needs to be changed. Right now a committee made up of mostly current and former players and coaches who then vote to rank teams. Now the members are required to recuse themselves when voting on teams they are currently employed by, receive financial compensation from, or have family members who receive financial compensation from, but they can still vote for or against schools they played for or worked for in the past. This can lead to major bias and a drive to make sure big teams get into the playoffs while lesser known teams are shut out.\n\nThere is also the fact that the College Football Playoffs (CFP) is not an [NCAA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association) sanctioned event. This means that the governing body for the CFP can do what ever they want (though at the moment they do follow NCAA rules) they could change rules, block schools from being eligible or anything they see fit.\n\n##\n# The Basics\n\nCurrently the NCAA has 130 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_programs) teams\\* in 10 [FBS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I#FBS_and_FCS) conferences, those conferences are listed below:\n\n- [The American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Athletic_Conference)\n- [ACC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Coast_Conference)\n- [Big Ten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference)\n- [Big 12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Conference)\n- [C-USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_USA)\n- [MAC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-American_Conference)\n- [MW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_West_Conference)\n- [Pac-12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-12_Conference)\n- [SEC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference)\n- [Sun Belt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Belt_Conference)\n\n\\*Four team are FBS eligible but are not members of a conference they are [Army](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Academy), [BYU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_University), [Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst), [Notre Dame](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame)\n\nCurrently under the CFP system only 25 teams are ranked by the committee leaving out 105 teams from the rankings. There is also the issue (albeit a small issue) that teams are ranked before the season starts showing a bias right from the start. Currently the only conferences who have appeared in the playoffs are all members of the “[Power Five](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Five_conferences)” they are ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC and the [CFP voting committee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Selection_process) requires that a representative from each of the “Power Five” conferences be on the voting committee.\n\nAs you can see there is a clear bias against smaller and less well funded schools and a bias that favors the more well known and better funded schools in the “Power Five” conferences.\n\n##\n# What Should Be Done\n\nFirst of all the NCAA should put it’s foot down and take control of the National Championship, there is no reason the biggest game of the college football season shouldn’t be run by the governing body of college football. Why should a rouge organization be in charge of the championship? In professorial sports the [NFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League), [NBA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Basketball_Association), [MLB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball), [NHL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hockey_League) all run their championship games, why shouldn’t the NCAA? Sure the NCAA isn’t perfect, but I’d trust the official governing body of college sports to rank and run the championship over a rouge group that is clearly bias.\n\n#####\n# Rankings\n\nThe ranking system should rank every team in the FBS, all 130 of them. Rankings should be determined like this:\n\n- Rankings are only determined from conference games\\*\n- Each team must play at least 8 conference games to qualify for the playoffs\n- Rankings will be the score of each team at the end of each game plus 2 points to the winning team\n- For every 20 fouls called on a team 1 point be be deducted from the ranking score\n- Any foul that results in an ejection from the game will result in the team losing one point from the ranking score\n- Rankings will continue until the National Championship game between the final teams ranked #1 & #2\n- If the #2 team wins the National Championship then they will become the #1 team regardless of NCAA ranking points\n\n\\*The four FBS eligible independent teams will have to join a conference to be eligible for the playoffs.\n\n#####\n# Conferences\n\nAt the end of the regular season the conferences should take the NCAA rankings of their teams and have the two highest scoring teams (that are playoff eligible according to the rules above) play for their conference championship. Any team that did not play the required 8 conference games will be ineligible for both the playoffs and the conference championship.\n\n#####\n# The Playoffs\n\nThe playoffs should be held between the top eight of the ten conference champions according to points including points earned during the conference game, the two lowest scoring conference champions will not be eligible for the National Championship Playoffs. Point based ranking will continue until the National Championship Game between the #1 & #2 teams. After the first and second weeks of playoffs the winners of each game will be ranked according to points following the same rules as in the regular season to decide who will play who in the next round.\n\nThe Bracket for the playoffs should look something like this:\n\n![](http://oppy1984.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAA-CFP-Bracket.jpg)\n\n##\n# Conclusion",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":\"oppy1984\",\"app\":\"wp-steem/1.0.5\",\"community\":\"blogs\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "title": "The College Football Playoff system is unfair and what should be done about it"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:14:57",
  "trx_id": "1671d15cec12da68460a2446cf5e4e7520b94919",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2017/11/05 06:13:27
authoroppy1984
permlinkcollege-football-playoff-system-unfair
voterkromtar
weight300 (3.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #16948194/Trx 72166ddadddf1cdd1cee89d8df9ea4dddb0a8c40
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 16948194,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "oppy1984",
      "permlink": "college-football-playoff-system-unfair",
      "voter": "kromtar",
      "weight": 300
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-11-05T06:13:27",
  "trx_id": "72166ddadddf1cdd1cee89d8df9ea4dddb0a8c40",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

Account Metadata

POSTING JSON METADATA
profile{"name":"oppy1984","location":"Ohio, USA","website":"https://oppy1984.com/"}
JSON METADATA
profile{"name":"oppy1984","location":"Ohio, USA","website":"https://oppy1984.com/"}
{
  "posting_json_metadata": {
    "profile": {
      "name": "oppy1984",
      "location": "Ohio, USA",
      "website": "https://oppy1984.com/"
    }
  },
  "json_metadata": {
    "profile": {
      "name": "oppy1984",
      "location": "Ohio, USA",
      "website": "https://oppy1984.com/"
    }
  }
}

Auth Keys

Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM5ujdPy2Y8jxePBZZ8ffPtrCc9HsrznFH1TDED8HjTtRhxhhnwo1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM7LokSgTVdrXPRzoLMXsYBEFNQdo2qAwN5KP55VY7RnXGfTHxJt1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6dTT9NvYjc9QAgKtWa4aBUDJcZEqNHJeLE3qu2PbmjasejYPrm1/1
Memo
STM5bsdqE3FjywQKhCtnFvQNMkj8ZmYTKFfRHG4TqXmSvCAfpQhqt
{
  "owner": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM5ujdPy2Y8jxePBZZ8ffPtrCc9HsrznFH1TDED8HjTtRhxhhnwo",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "active": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM7LokSgTVdrXPRzoLMXsYBEFNQdo2qAwN5KP55VY7RnXGfTHxJt",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "posting": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6dTT9NvYjc9QAgKtWa4aBUDJcZEqNHJeLE3qu2PbmjasejYPrm",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "memo": "STM5bsdqE3FjywQKhCtnFvQNMkj8ZmYTKFfRHG4TqXmSvCAfpQhqt"
}

Witness Votes

0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]